Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gellman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$95kReligion$92kHealth$64kFood & Nutrition$36kHuman Services$30kEnvironment$26kArts & Culture$20kCivil Rights$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMITH-BARBIERI FUND$8,000
CHABAD HOUSE OF SPOKANE$8,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$4,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$4,000
PHB SANTA MONICA SYNAGOGUE$3,500
CHABAD OF EUGENE$3,500
LOS ANGELES FOOD BANK$3,200
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$2,500
BOLTS (THE POLITICAL REPORT)$2,500
HOPE HOUSE - VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$2,500
MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT$2,000
OU - JLIC$2,000
LOUIS D BRANDEIS CENTER$2,000
HOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS$2,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENCE COUNCIL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $3k → 11%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $2k → 11%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $2k → 11%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $2k → 11%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $2k → 11%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECY: $1k → 11%HOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS: $2k → 14%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $1k → 11%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $1k → 11%FULFILLMENT FUND: $2k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $2k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $2k → 14%SILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JCC: $2k → 14%SPECTRUM: $2k → 12%SILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JCC: $2k → 14%ROSALIE MURREY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%ROSALIE MURREY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$332k · 44 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
57

Total granted

$332k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

39%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationCivil RightsHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $24k · revenue +65%
  • Community Health Association of Spokane
    3× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +40%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA - HOPE HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • ML
    MEDICAL LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • NS
    NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Work on Climate

Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and make green careers transitions and driving the adoption of green workforce development practices broadly.

Environment
3
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Orcid Inc

Orcid provides an identifier for individuals to use with their name as they engage in research, scholarship, and innovation activities. we provide open tools that enable transparent and trustworthy connections between researchers, their…

Education
5
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
6
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
7
Open Transformation Lab Inc

The missions is to provide information and resources to counter disinformation, propaganda, and offer a window to trusted content about the events that are going on in the Middle East.

Science & Tech
8
Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc

Simon wiesenthal center, inc. (the center) is a global jewish human rights activist organization that confronts anti-semitism, hate, stands with israel, defends the safety of jews worldwide, and teaches the lessons of the holocaust for…

Arts & Culture
9
Indivisible Civics

The mission of indivisible civics is to build civic leadership to empower a grassroots movement that's advancing progressive values and policies. it educates and builds the capacity of grassroots activists with organizing support,…

Civil Rights
10
The Lawfare Project Inc

We are a global network of legal professionals that contribute our skills time and expertise to defending the civil and human rights of the jewish people and fighting discrimination wherever we see it.

International
11
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
12
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel On Campus Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spectrum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/41
Grantees still filing
20/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD HOUSE OF SPOKANE: $19,800 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE OF SPOKANELOS ANGELES FOOD BANK: $17,200 · OtherLOS ANGELES FOOD BANKNATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENCE COUNCIL: $14,250 · OtherTHE OPEN TEMPLE: $13,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $12,500 · OtherCHABAD OF EUGENE: $11,100 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA - HOPE HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherMEDICAL LAKE FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Other+75 more: $180,510 · Other+75 moreVillage Life Outreach Project Inc: $28,800 · HealthVillage Life…Community Health Association of Spokane: $21,000 · HealthCommunity He…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthROSALIE MURREY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesROSALIE MUR…MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesMARBLE HOUS…FULFILLMENT FUND: $6,000 · Human ServicesFULFILLMENT…NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST S…SILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesSILVERLAKE …HOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $23,500 · EducationUNIVERSIT…WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $15,000 · EducationWILLIAM J…+2 more: $1,500 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,900 · Civil RightsPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $5,000 · Civil RightsSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $3,100 · Civil RightsFAIRVOTE: $2,300 · Civil RightsJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $11,500 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $2,500 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $1,000 · International350ORG: $3,000 · EnvironmentOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $2,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE EARTH: $1,000 · Environment
Other$288,360Health$50,800Human Services$46,000Education$40,000Civil Rights$21,300International$15,000Environment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVillage Life Outreach Project Inc: $28,800 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $23,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health Association of Spokane: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROSALIE MURREY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARBLE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $13,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAKIBA ACADEMY OF DALLAS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFairmount Memorial Association: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $3,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budget350ORG: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPOKANE JAZZ SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYestermorrow Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEFESH LA: $1,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARLEY SCHOOL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSpectrum: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElementz: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRYBAL GATHERINGS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Village Life Outreach Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Association of Spokane ↗
  • Who funds ROSALIE MURREY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AKIBA ACADEMY OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds Fairmount Memorial Association ↗
  • Who funds SPREAD THE VOTE INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gellman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gellman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gellman’s filings →

More from the funding graph