Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Garnett a Smith Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of THE GARNETT A SMITH FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $165k
$25,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND FOUNDATION$165,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$25,250
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KINDNESS 4 KATE: $500 → 12%KINDNESS 4 KATE: $500 → 12%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $1k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $150 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
WY
PA
MO
MD
TN
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 10 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
21

Total granted

$1.0M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+98%

Still filing today

50%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $25k · revenue +14%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +112%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2019–2025 · $6k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +31%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +66%
  • BM
    Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

2
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
3
Florida Keys Educational Foundation Inc

To provide financial and other essential support to further the mission and goals of the college of the florida keys (cfk).

4
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
5
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
6
University of Florida Jacksonville Physicians Inc

University of florida jacksonville physicians, inc. is dedicated to making a difference in the lives of those we serve by providing exceptional and innovative practice management in support of the university of florida college of medicine…

Health
7
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

8
The Florida International University Health Care Network Inc

Fiu health care network's mission is to improve and support medical education at the fiu herbert wertheim college of medicine and provide clinical support services to the larger fiu community.

9
Florida Polytechnic University Foundation Inc

Established to help sustain the mission of florida polytechnic university to educate students emphasizing science, technology, engineering and mathematics (stem) in an innovative, technology-rich, and interdisciplinary learning environment.

Education
10
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
11
Florida International University Foundation Inc

To encourage, solicit, receive and administer gifts and bequests of property and funds for scientific, educational and charitable purposes, all for the advancement of florida international university and its objectives (see schedule o for…

Education
12
Shands Jacksonville Foundation Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Education Equity LeadershipDevelopmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…United Way FederationsCommunity Health CentersPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr14%9%35–55yr14%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr14%0%35–55yr14%66%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,333

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND FOUNDATION — $927,204 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND FOUNDATION+12 more — $45,900 · OtherThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc — $100,000 · PhilanthropyThe Community…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $36,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOU…UNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…+3 more — $7,620 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationTHE UNIVER…THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationTHE UNIVER…+1 more — $500 · EducationNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $6,400 · Health+2 more — $1,100 · HealthBella Mente Quantum Racing Association — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNAPLES TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentKINDNESS4KATE — $1,000 · Human ServicesGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INC — $500 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center Inc — $150 · Human Services
Other$973,104Philanthropy$153,620Education$115,500Health$32,500Recreation & Sports$10,500Youth Development$5,000Human Services$2,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $6,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST GEORGIA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINDNESS4KATE — $1,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENTRY SERVICES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Garnett a Smith Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph