Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Garber Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$419k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$262k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$930kEducation$559kCivil Rights$300kFood & Nutrition$248kYouth Development$95kInternational$50kArts & Culture$30kRecreation & Sports$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
  • $250k+1 grant · $262k
$8,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITY WATERS$262,445
FAR AND WISE$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION$13,500
CONVOY OF HOPE$10,000
WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA$8,000
AUSTIN EMS RELIEF FUND$5,000
THE SPACE$5,000
THE ADVOCATES$5,000
PASSTHROUGH FROM AJ CAP RE FUND II$5
PASSTHROUGH FROM Q-BLK REAL ASSETS II LP$2
PASSTHROUGH FROM FORTRESS CREDIT OPP FUND V(A) LP$1
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $712k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHARITY WATERS: $262k → 4%CHARITY WATER: $200k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $200k → 17%INTREPID EVENTS INC: $50k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
CA
MO
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$718k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$1.5M
$650k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+25%

Still filing today

60%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +34%
  • FI
    FARWISE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +35%
  • WR
    WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • TU
    The University of Texas at Austin
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • FB
    Food Bank-Central Texas
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • CI
    Communities in Schools
    one grant, 2020 · $84k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
2
Alaska Wilderness League

Protect alaska's wild lands and waters by inspiring broad support for federal policy action.

Environment
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
7
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
8
Hostage Aid Worldwide Inc

Hostage aid's mission is to assist hostages and unlawful detainees and their families by providing insights on their cases and coordination with governments & un bodies, as well as strategies to disrupt the hostage business model and the…

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Refugees International Inc

Refugees international advocates for lifesaving assistance, human rights, and protection for displaced people and promotes solutions to displacement crisis.

International
10
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Breakthrough Collaborative; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $862,445 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INCINTREPID EVENTS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesINTREPID EVENTS INCThe University of Texas at Austin: $200,000 · OtherThe University of Texas at AustinCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $175,520 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLFood Bank-Central Texas: $100,000 · OtherFood Bank-Central TexasCommunities in Schools: $83,900 · OtherCommunities in SchoolsSUN VALLEY TOUR DE FORCE: $70,000 · OtherSUN VALLEY TOUR DE FORCEIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+15 more: $97,034 · Other+15 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $300,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATIO…FARWISE INC: $120,000 · EducationFARWISE I…THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $60,000 · EducationTHE BREAK…The Space Idaho Inc: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPE: $10,000 · InternationalALLIANCE OF IDAHO INC: $5,000 · InternationalWOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC: $18,500 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN PARAMEDIC RELIEF AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFRIENDS OF THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST AVALANCHE CENTER INC: $2,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$912,445Other$776,454Civil Rights$300,000Education$190,000International$65,000Recreation & Sports$18,500Public Safety & Disaster$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $862,445 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFARWISE INC: $120,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetINTREPID EVENTS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC: $18,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Space Idaho Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE OF IDAHO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST AVALANCHE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWEE RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FARWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds INTREPID EVENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PARAMEDIC RELIEF AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Space Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST AVALANCHE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEE RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spur Community Foundation IncID13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spur Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Garber Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Garber Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Garber Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Garber Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Garber Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph