· Private foundation
G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k51 grants · $116k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $655k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $774k
- $250k+2 grants · $522k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION | $261,915 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $260,000 |
| CARLETON COLLEGE | $237,500 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY | $105,186 |
| KC UNCORNERED | $100,400 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES | $61,000 |
| NEW REFORM TEMPLE | $58,743 |
| KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY | $56,000 |
| KAUFFMAN CENTER OF THE PERFORMING ARTS | $55,000 |
| HOLOCAUST CENTER OF PITTSBURGH | $50,000 |
| HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK | $50,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF KANSAS | $47,500 |
| GREATER KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| UMKC FOUNDATION | $41,000 |
| KANSAS CITY HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE | $40,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $822k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +38%
- KCKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY6× · 2019–2024 · $544k · revenue +13%
- CCCARLETON COLLEGE2× · 2019–2024 · $363k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- CCCARLETON COLLEGEone grant, 2020 · $125k
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -19%
- MTMERCY & TRUTH HEALTHCARE MINISTRY INCone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.
To inspire and engage through the beauty, power and passion of dance
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
The memorial unions function as a concessionaire to the university of kansas for the purpose of operating various enterprises within the kansas union building, the burge union, the debruce center, residential dining halls, and other…
Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.
Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.
We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.
See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…
To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…
To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Umkc Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Obermayer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
136 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 136 of the 196 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE SHALOM INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
- Who funds Saint Lukes Foundation ↗
- Who funds LYRIC OPERA OF KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds UNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF KS ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF PRAIRIEFIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UMKC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · The Francis Family Foundation · Copaken Family Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Muriel McBrien Kauffman Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sosland Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc — 2% of income from government
- Island Housing Trust Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Guthrie Center Corp — 1% of income from government
- New England Conservatory of Music — 1% of income from government
- Circuit Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Island Grown Initiative Ltd — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund?
Find your warmest path to G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.