Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frieda & Leon Steinberg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$217k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

72% of The Frieda & Leon Steinberg Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Las Vegas Sigesmund Center, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
3
’18
7
’19
6
’20
6
’21
2
’22
1
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$507kReligion$338kInternational$66kYouth Development$51kHuman Services$18kCivil Rights$11kEducation$11kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH NEVADA$150,000
TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM$45,000
GIRLS TOWN OR CHADASH$5,000
THE JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$5,000
BBYO$5,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$5,000
CHABAD OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of The Frieda & Leon Steinberg Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in NV; by stated purpose, 82%.

The Frieda & Leon Steinberg Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$429k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+252%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $13k · revenue +185%
  • NA
    Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $36k · revenue +252%
  • TR
    The Ronald & Judy Mack Religious Education Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +246%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Jewish Life Foundation
—
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
7
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
8
The Jerusalem Connection
—
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
11
Jewish Endowment Foundation

The jewish endowment foundation of louisiana (jef), chartered in 1967, ensures a secure future and an enduring legacy by serving as an essential resource for jewish and non-jewish philanthropy.

Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Magen David Adom; the most unlike its peers is The Ronald & Judy Mack Religious Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER: $507,100 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTERTEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $282,300 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHOLOMGIRLS TOWN OR CHADASH: $40,500 · OtherCHABAD OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC: $32,200 · Other+11 more: $55,260 · Other+11 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $36,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $30,000 · InternationalB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentNathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationYESHIVA DAY SCHOOL OF LAS VEGAS: $1,600 · Education
Other$917,360International$66,000Youth Development$15,000Human Services$7,500Education$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER: $507,100 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $36,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY: $13,230 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDR MIRIAM AND SHELDON G ADELSON EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE: $5,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ronald & Judy Mack Religious Education Foundation: $1,800 over 1y, 15% of budgetYESHIVA DAY SCHOOL OF LAS VEGAS: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DR MIRIAM AND SHELDON G ADELSON EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Ronald & Judy Mack Religious Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DAY SCHOOL OF LAS VEGAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Steinberg Family FoundationNV15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Steinberg Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Las Vegas Sigesmund Center · The Lionel Foundation · Susan G Fine Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frieda & Leon Steinberg Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frieda & Leon Steinberg Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frieda & Leon Steinberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph