Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Freedom and Justice Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$355k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$609kCrime & Legal$392kCivil Rights$243kCommunity Improvement$212kPhilanthropy$181kPublic Benefit$144kHuman Services$46kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $263k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$4,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION HUDSON VALLEY$51,000
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$42,500
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$40,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$40,000
USC ALZHEIMER RESEARCH FUND$40,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$40,000
CATO INSTITUTE$25,050
LOVE ENDURES MINISTRIES$19,800
INVESTOR CHOICE ADVOCATES NETWORK$16,000
STATE POLICY NETWORK$6,000
INDEPENDENT WOMENS FORUM$5,000
MOUNTAIN STATE LEGAL FOUNDATION$4,000
FIRST LIBERTY$4,000
YOUNG VOICES$4,000
INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC: $500 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 9%BELEV ECHAD: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of The Freedom and Justice Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Freedom and Justice Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 30 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
26

Total granted

$2.1M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+20%

Still filing today

57%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsPublic BenefitHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $254k · revenue +81%
  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $245k · revenue +72%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $245k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • AH
    AMERICAN HEALTH LEGAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +71%
  • OI
    OFFICIAL IMMUNITY PROJECT
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • NA
    NATIIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
3
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
4
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
5
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
8
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
9
Atlantic Legal Foundation

The mission of the alf is to advance the rule of law by advocating limited and efficient government, free enterprise, individual liberty, property rights, effective education, and the use of sound science in judicial and regulatory…

—
10
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
11
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies; the most unlike its peers is Northern Trust Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
21/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION HUDSON VALLEY: $326,500 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION HUDSON VALLEYCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $254,000 · OtherCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTEUSC ALZHEIMER RESEARCH FUND: $246,000 · OtherUSC ALZHEIMER RESEARCH FUNDONE2ONE USA FOUNDATION: $61,000 · OtherONE2ONE USA FOUNDATIONLOVE ENDURES MINISTRIES: $53,800 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $40,000 · Other+40 more: $137,181 · Other+40 moreALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $245,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOMINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $225,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICEFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $19,000 · Civil Rights+5 more: $35,000 · Civil Rights+5 morePacific Legal Foundation: $245,000 · Crime & LegalPacific Lega…+1 more: $3,000 · Crime & LegalCATO INSTITUTE: $130,255 · Public BenefitCATO INST…INVESTOR CHOICE ADVOCATES NETWORK: $49,000 · Public BenefitINVESTOR …+1 more: $6,000 · Public BenefitNORTHERN TRUST FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyParamount Hudson Valley Arts Inc: $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$1,118,481Civil Rights$524,000Crime & Legal$248,000Public Benefit$185,255Philanthropy$120,500Arts & Culture$10,000Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $254,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $245,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $245,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $225,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $130,255 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN TRUST FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetINVESTOR CHOICE ADVOCATES NETWORK: $49,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIndependent Women's Forum: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParamount Hudson Valley Arts Inc: $9,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAIRNESS CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $2,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFPC ACTION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC: $835 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BOOK PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLEASANTVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN TRUST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INVESTOR CHOICE ADVOCATES NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HEALTH LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Independent Women's Forum ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Paramount Hudson Valley Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH ↗
  • Who funds THE FAIRNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Freedom and Justice Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Freedom and Justice Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Freedom and Justice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph