Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Fred M Kemp Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$103kEducation$87kHuman Services$58kArts & Culture$20kHousing & Shelter$2kScience & Tech$1kReligion$1kPublic Benefit$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATI$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$237k · 4 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$237k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-52%
+76%

Still filing today

50%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THRIVE ST LOUIS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $103k · revenue -52%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $71k
  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CITY CHILDREN'S CENTER
    6× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue -95%

Funded once

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +76%
  • NM
    NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +69%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue ×16

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
4
The Harry S Truman Library Institute National and International Affairs

To preserve and promote the enduring legacy of harry s. truman, america's 33rd president.

Education
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Southwestern University

Southwestern university, under the auspices of the united methodist church, is committed to undergraduate liberal arts education involving both the study of and participation in significant aspects of our cultural heritage, expressed…

Education
10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
12
University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St Louis

The university's mission is to educate and advance communities of discovery to foster a healthier society.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truman State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Life Waters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL — $71,000 · OtherST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY CITY CHILDREN'S CENTER — $55,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY CITY CHILDREN'S CENTERNATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATION — $11,264 · OtherNATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATIONTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATI — $8,250 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATI+7 more — $4,750 · OtherTHRIVE ST LOUIS INC — $103,000 · HealthTHRIVE ST LOUIS INCWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $300 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMICS INC — $2,000 · Community ImprovementLOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesLIFE WATERS — $500 · Public Benefit
Other$150,264Health$103,000Education$15,300Community Improvement$2,000Human Services$1,500Public Benefit$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHRIVE ST LOUIS INC — $103,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY CITY CHILDREN'S CENTER — $55,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATION — $11,264 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE WATERS — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THRIVE ST LOUIS INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CITY CHILDREN'S CENTER
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATION
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMICS INC
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC
  • Who funds LIFE WATERS
  • Who funds TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO17.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Fred M Kemp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Fred M Kemp Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Fred M Kemp Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph