Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$95kEducation$82kReligion$75kRecreation & Sports$8kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$5kInternational$5kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$8,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$5,000
RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA$2,000
SUNRISE ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%LARGER THAN LIFE: $30k → 13%THE GLORIA FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%THE GLORIA FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%THE GLORIA FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 33%.

The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 18 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$232k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    Israeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +176% · 50% of their budget
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +179%
  • S
    SPECTRUM360
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • LT
    LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -23%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL JEWISH DEFENSE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • AT
    AMERICAN TECHION SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
6
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
7
The Wisdom Center for Autism

To support individuals with developmental challenges and exceptional abilities to achieve their full potential.

Health
8
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
9
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
12
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrise Day Camps Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Harbor Country Public Arts Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE SHOLOM OF WEST ESSEX: $25,000 · OtherTEMPLE SHOLOM OF WEST ESSEXCongregation Agudath Israel: $15,000 · OtherCongregation Agudath IsraelTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN FRIENDS: $13,000 · OtherTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN FRIENDSTHE LAUREL SCHOOL OF PRINCETON: $12,500 · OtherTHE LAUREL SCHOOL OF PRINCETONMOUNT FREEDOM JEWISH CENTER: $12,500 · OtherMOUNT FREEDOM JEWISH CENTERTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN COUNCIL: $11,000 · OtherTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN COUNCILLUBAVITCH OF ESSEX COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherLUBAVITCH OF ESSEX COUNTYSUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · OtherSUNRISE ASSOCIATIONFRIENDS OF ISRAEL JEWISH DEFENSE: $5,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · OtherFOOD ALLERGY AND RESEARCH EDUCATION: $5,000 · Other+7 more: $15,000 · Other+7 moreAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $52,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of …LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesLARGER THAN LI…THE GLORIA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE GLORIA FOU…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesIsraeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc: $25,000 · HealthIsraeli Pedia…AUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $4,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'…RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $10,000 · EducationRABBINICA…SPECTRUM360: $10,000 · EducationSPECTRUM3…MYCHILD'SCANCER INC: $2,500 · EducationMYCHILD'S…Saint Elizabeth University: $2,500 · EducationSaint Eli…FOWA Rescue Inc: $3,000 · AnimalsHARBOR COUNTRY PUBLIC ARTS INITIATIVE: $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$137,000International$52,000Human Services$37,000Health$34,000Education$25,000Animals$3,000Community Improvement$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $52,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLARGER THAN LIFE USA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetIsraeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPECTRUM360: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLORIA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 10.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOWA Rescue Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHARBOR COUNTRY PUBLIC ARTS INITIATIVE: $2,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetSaint Elizabeth University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Apostles' House: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
  • Who funds LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Israeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM360 ↗
  • Who funds THE GLORIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds FOWA Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds MYCHILD'SCANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR COUNTRY PUBLIC ARTS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Saint Elizabeth University ↗
  • Who funds THE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Apostles' House ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natan Blutinger & Sara Blutinger Charitable FoundationNJ28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natan Blutinger & Sara Blutinger Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Rabbinical College of America: 5% of income from government
  • Saint Elizabeth University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred August and Adele Wolpers’ filings →

More from the funding graph