Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of THE FRED AUGUST AND ADELE WOLPERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$8,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$5,000
RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA$2,000
SUNRISE ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%LARGER THAN LIFE: $30k → 13%THE GLORIA FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%THE GLORIA FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%THE GLORIA FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 33% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$232k · 18 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$232k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    Israeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +176% · 50% of their budget
  • S
    SPECTRUM360
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +80%
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • LT
    LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -23%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL JEWISH DEFENSE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • AT
    AMERICAN TECHION SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
6
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
7
The Wisdom Center for Autism

To support individuals with developmental challenges and exceptional abilities to achieve their full potential.

Health
8
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
9
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
12
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrise Day Camps Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harbor Country Public Arts Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEMPLE SHOLOM OF WEST ESSEX — $25,000 · OtherTEMPLE SHOLOM OF WEST ESSEXCongregation Agudath Israel — $15,000 · OtherCongregation Agudath IsraelTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN FRIENDS — $13,000 · OtherTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN FRIENDSTHE LAUREL SCHOOL OF PRINCETON — $12,500 · OtherTHE LAUREL SCHOOL OF PRINCETONMOUNT FREEDOM JEWISH CENTER — $12,500 · OtherMOUNT FREEDOM JEWISH CENTERTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN COUNCIL — $11,000 · OtherTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY - AMERICAN COUNCILLUBAVITCH OF ESSEX COUNTY — $10,000 · OtherLUBAVITCH OF ESSEX COUNTYSUNRISE ASSOCIATION — $8,000 · OtherSUNRISE ASSOCIATIONFRIENDS OF ISRAEL JEWISH DEFENSE — $5,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · OtherFOOD ALLERGY AND RESEARCH EDUCATION — $5,000 · Other+7 more — $15,000 · Other+7 moreAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $52,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of …LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesLARGER THAN LI…THE GLORIA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE GLORIA FOU…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesIsraeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc — $25,000 · HealthIsraeli Pedia…AUTISM SPEAKS INC — $5,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $4,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'…SPECTRUM360 — $10,000 · EducationSPECTRUM3…RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA — $10,000 · EducationRABBINICA…Saint Elizabeth University — $2,500 · EducationSaint Eli…MYCHILD'SCANCER INC — $2,500 · EducationMYCHILD'S…FOWA Rescue Inc — $3,000 · AnimalsHARBOR COUNTRY PUBLIC ARTS INITIATIVE — $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$137,000International$52,000Human Services$37,000Health$34,000Education$25,000Animals$3,000Community Improvement$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $52,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLARGER THAN LIFE USA INC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetIsraeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetSPECTRUM360 — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLORIA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 3y, 10.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOWA Rescue Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHARBOR COUNTRY PUBLIC ARTS INITIATIVE — $2,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetSaint Elizabeth University — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Apostles' House — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ
  • Who funds LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC
  • Who funds Israeli Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Inc
  • Who funds SPECTRUM360
  • Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE GLORIA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds FOWA Rescue Inc
  • Who funds HARBOR COUNTRY PUBLIC ARTS INITIATIVE
  • Who funds Saint Elizabeth University
  • Who funds MYCHILD'SCANCER INC
  • Who funds THE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds The Apostles' House

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natan Blutinger & Sara Blutinger Charitable FoundationNJ28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natan Blutinger & Sara Blutinger Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Rabbinical College of America5% of income from government
  • Saint Elizabeth University2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Fred August and Adele Wolpers Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph