Skip to content
The Fred and June Macmurray Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Fred and June Macmurray Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$888k
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.4MReligion$1.3MHealth$951kEducation$623kArts & Culture$468kHousing & Shelter$377kYouth Development$338kEmployment$286kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $660k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA PROVINCE OF SOCIETY OF JESUS$50,000
ANOVA EDUCATION AND BEHAVIORAL CONSULTATION INC$50,000
THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT$50,000
FRANK D LANTERMAN REGIONAL CENTER$45,000
SANTA CHIARA CHILDREN'S CENTER$35,000
DOLORES MISSION$30,000
ROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE$30,000
NATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION$30,000
FOOD CYCLE LA$30,000
LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
STURGEONS MILL RESTORATION PROJECT INC$25,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$25,000
ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$20,000
PRESENTATION SISTERS LEARNING CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SANTA CHIARA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 13%SANTA CHIARA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 13%SANTA CHIARA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 13%YWCA SONOMA COUNTY: $35k → 9%SANTA CHIARA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $32k → 13%YWCA SONOMA COUNTY: $30k → 9%SANTA CHIARA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 13%YWCA SONOMA COUNTY: $20k → 9%SANTA CHIARA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $15k → 13%YWCA SONOMA COUNTY: $15k → 9%YWCA SONOMA COUNTY: $15k → 9%YWCA SONOMA COUNTY: $15k → 9%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $30k → 14%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES: $25k → 14%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES: $25k → 14%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $25k → 14%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES: $25k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $15k → 14%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES: $25k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $15k → 14%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES: $25k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES: $25k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $20k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $15k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $65k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $50k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $50k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $50k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $50k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $30k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $25k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $15k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $15k → 14%HOLLYWOOD WILSHIRE YMCA: $10k → 14%HOLLYWOOD WILSHIRE YMCA: $10k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CT
CA
MO
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Fred and June Macmurray Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 80%.

The Fred and June Macmurray Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 80 repeat orgs$535k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

80 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
34

Total granted

$6.0M
$400k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+36%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +443%
  • RO
    ROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +79%
  • NV
    NATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $225k · revenue +622%

Funded once

  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • AO
    ABBEY OF REGINA LAUDIS (NEW HORIZONS)
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • UO
    UNION OF SISTERS OF THE PRESENTATION OF BMV
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
2
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
3
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
9
Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health

Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.

Health
10
Saint Agnes Medical Foundation

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical foundation is a member of saint agnes medical…

Health
11
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
12
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Healdsburg Museum and Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
55/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRANK D LANTERMAN REGIONAL CENTER: $360,000 · OtherFRANK D LANTERMAN REGIONAL CENTERCALIFORNIA PROVINCE OF SOCIETY OF JESUS: $350,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA PROVINCE OF SOCIETY OF JESUSARCHDIOCESAN YOUTH EMPLOYMENT SERVICES: $255,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESAN YOUTH EMPLOYMENT SERVICESNATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 · OtherNATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INCBLESSED SACRAMENT SCHOOL: $205,000 · OtherFOODCYCLE: $140,000 · Other+81 more: $2,410,000 · Other+81 moreTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $350,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWO…LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $205,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES PREGNANCY…Santa Chiara Childrens Center: $182,000 · Human ServicesSanta Chiara Children…THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY: $130,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHR…EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesValley Family Center: $60,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $50,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTER: $45,000 · Human Services+5 more: $74,500 · Human Services+5 moreHeart Touch Project: $160,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY INC: $70,000 · HealthResurrecting Lives Foundation: $15,000 · HealthGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS: $13,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,500 · HealthTRUE WEST FILM CENTER: $162,730 · Arts & CultureSTURGEONS MILL RESTORATION PROJECT: $60,585 · Arts & CultureACADEMY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSONOMA VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL: $40,000 · Arts & CultureHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE: $244,700 · Animals+2 more: $4,500 · AnimalsHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOTUS OUTREACH: $37,500 · Youth DevelopmentMAKING THE RIGHT CONNECTIONS INC: $50,000 · EducationANOVA EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR CONSULTATION INC: $50,000 · EducationVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $30,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationST JOHN THE BAPTIST HEALDSBURG SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $7,500 · Education
Other$3,945,000Human Services$1,236,500Health$341,000Arts & Culture$340,815Animals$249,200Youth Development$237,500Education$172,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $350,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE: $244,700 over 8y, 23% of budgetNATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $205,000 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSanta Chiara Childrens Center: $182,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetTRUE WEST FILM CENTER: $162,730 over 6y, 13% of budgetHeart Touch Project: $160,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetFOODCYCLE: $140,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY: $130,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSt Francis Center: $105,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSt Anne's Foundation: $80,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY INC: $70,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTURGEONS MILL RESTORATION PROJECT: $60,585 over 3y, 22% of budgetValley Family Center: $60,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING THE RIGHT CONNECTIONS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetACADEMY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANOVA EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR CONSULTATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $49,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEFFREY MODELL FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPax et Bonum Communications Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL: $40,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetChildren of the Night: $40,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLOTUS OUTREACH: $37,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $30,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC: $27,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $27,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $22,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHealdsburg Museum and Historical Society: $22,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTierra del Sol Foundation: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JESUIT RETREAT CENTER OF LOS ALTOS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResurrecting Lives Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS: $13,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIGNATIANS WEST: $10,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetST JOHN THE BAPTIST HEALDSBURG SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRotary Club of Los Angeles Foundation: $7,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD ↗
  • Who funds ROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Santa Chiara Childrens Center ↗
  • Who funds TRUE WEST FILM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Heart Touch Project ↗
  • Who funds FOODCYCLE ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Center ↗
  • Who funds St Anne's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds STURGEONS MILL RESTORATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Valley Family Center ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds MAKING THE RIGHT CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Ahmanson Foundati…The Michael & Patrici…Carrie Estelle Doheny…Klm FoundationCatholic Community Fo…Sonoma County Communi…William H Hannon Foun…Weingart FoundationThomas & Dorothy Leav…The Green FoundationThe Rose Hills Founda…
California Community FoundationCA24.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Michael & Patricia Smith Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Klm Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Sonoma County Community Foundation · William H Hannon Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Thomas & Dorothy Leavey Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fred and June Macmurray Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fred and June Macmurray Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 124 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred and June Macmurray’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home