Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Franklin H Green Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$67kArts & Culture$17kRecreation & Sports$13kHealth$13kReligion$9kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$5kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$876
Median grant
8
States reached
$382k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSCPA$2,500
Central New England Equine Rescue (CNEER)$1,500
Wounded Warriors Project$1,236
Stray Pets in Need of Massachusetts$1,010
MSCPA$1,000
ASPCA$1,000
Humane World FKA Humand Society of the United States$1,000
Flagler Humane Society$884
Second Chance Animal Services$876
National Trust for Historic Preservation$773
Great Pyrenees Club of Western Pennsylvania$750
New Rattitude$511
National World War II Museum$500
MSCPA$500
National World War II Museum$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%New Rattitude: $511 → 9%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 8%New Rattitude: $500 → 9%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $1k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
CO
MD
KS
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 19 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$122k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+94%

Still filing today

63%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    STRAY PETS IN NEED OF MA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +125%
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +26%
  • CN
    CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND EQUINE RESCUE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • BB
    BOSTON BRUINS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • EC
    EQUINE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • NT
    NATIONAL TRUST
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
4
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
5
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
6
Powerful Paws Animal Rescue Inc

To help abandoned, surrendered, neglected and abused animals to find homes.

Animals
7
Associated Humane Societies Inc

Associated humane societies, (ahs), is the largest animal sheltering organization in new jersey and is also home to popcorn park, located at our ahs-lacey branch. popcorn park was established in 1977 and is a sanctuary for abused,…

Animals
8
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
9
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
10
Animal Rescue League of Boston

The animal rescue league of boston's vision is to confront animal cruelty and neglect at its root causes. through programs, services, and facilities focused on accessible animal care, public advocacy, and sustained anti-cruelty efforts...…

Animals
11
The Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County for the Prevention of Cruelty to

Together with our community, we better the lives of animals through justice, prevention, and life-saving care. lollypop farm, the humane society of greater rochester, envisions a just and compassionate world for all animals.

Animals
12
Pet Pride of New York Inc

Pet pride of new york has been saving homeless cats and matching them with caring adopters since 1977. we operate a no-kill cat sanctuary and adoption center with an on-site veterinary medical center where we shelter and care for cats and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MSPCA AT NEVINS FARM: $11,515 · OtherMSPCA AT NEVINS FARMCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHGREAT PYRENEES CLUB OF WESTERN PA: $7,750 · OtherGREAT PYRENEES CLUB OF WESTERN PABOSTON BRUINS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherBOSTON BRUINS FOUNDATIONMNSPCA AT NEVINS FARM: $4,500 · OtherMNSPCA AT NEVINS FARMMAYO CLINIC FLORIDA: $4,500 · OtherMAYO CLINIC FLORIDAMSCPA: $4,000 · OtherMSCPATHE HUMAN SOCIETY OF US: $3,500 · OtherTHE HUMAN SOCIETY OF USTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF US: $2,000 · Other+8 more: $6,250 · Other+8 moreSTRAY PETS IN NEED OF MA INC: $12,260 · AnimalsSTRAY PETS IN NEED OF MA INCCENTRAL NEW ENGLAND EQUINE RESCUE INC: $10,250 · AnimalsCENTRAL NEW ENGLAND EQUINE RESCUE …THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVE…FLAGLER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $7,384 · AnimalsFLAGLER HUMANE SOCIETY INCSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $2,876 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INCAnimals' Angels Incorporated: $1,800 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $8,486 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR …Compassionate Care ALS Inc: $5,412 · Human ServicesCompassionate Ca…FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE …NEW RATTITUDE: $1,011 · Human ServicesTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $11,600 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL …NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $5,023 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUS…BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $1,100 · HealthAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $500 · PhilanthropyPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $250 · Environment
Other$58,015Animals$43,070Human Services$19,909Arts & Culture$16,623Health$1,100Philanthropy$500Environment$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTRAY PETS IN NEED OF MA INC: $12,260 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $11,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL NEW ENGLAND EQUINE RESCUE INC: $10,250 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $8,486 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFLAGLER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $7,384 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc: $5,412 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $5,023 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $2,876 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAnimals' Angels Incorporated: $1,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW RATTITUDE: $1,011 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STRAY PETS IN NEED OF MA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FLAGLER HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassionate Care ALS Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Animals' Angels Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW RATTITUDE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Franklin H Green Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Franklin H Green Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Flagler Humane Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Franklin H Green Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Franklin H Green Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Franklin H Green Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph