Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frank and Mary Lamberson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$126kEnvironment$120kEducation$114kHealth$96kArts & Culture$44kAnimals$38kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$9,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FORCHILDREN$15,250
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL$15,250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WNC$10,000
ASHEVILLE AREA ARTS COUNCIL$9,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
VASSER COLLEGE$4,000
MITCHELL COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
SPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE: $1k → 16%MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE: $1k → 16%MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE: $1k → 16%MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE: $500 → 16%MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 12 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$395k
$5k

Still filing today

92%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureScience & TechHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $120k · revenue +114%
  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +19%
  • DZ
    DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Carolina Art Association Dba Gibbes Museum of Art

The mission of the gibbes museum of art is to enhance lives through art by engaging people of every background and experience with art and artists of enduring quality; collect and preserve the art that touches charleston; and provide…

Arts & Culture
3
Heckscher Museum

Museum has a mission to create opportunties for everyone to experience art that broadens understanding of the past, fosters community connections to the present, and creates diverse possbilities for the future.

Arts & Culture
4
Rochester Art Center

Rochester art center offers the opportunity for all people to understand and value the arts through innovative experiences with contemporary art. through world-class exhibitions and programs, we present a welcoming, integrated, and diverse…

Arts & Culture
5
The Charleston Museum

To educate Charleston area residents and visitors about the natural and cultural history of the South Carolina Lowcountry through collections, exhibitions, preservation, conservation, research and related programming.

Arts & Culture
6
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
7
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

To excite, engage and educate through the arts.

Arts & Culture
8
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute

See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.

Arts & Culture
9
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
10
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
11
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spruce Pine Montessori School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $75,250 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANVASSAR COLLEGE: $61,000 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGESPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $17,500 · OtherSPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INCTOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC: $15,500 · OtherTOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC+2 more: $10,000 · Other+2 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $126,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION O…FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $120,000 · Science & TechFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SO…DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · AnimalsMITCHELL COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $13,000 · AnimalsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $15,000 · EducationAsheville Art Museum Association Inc: $18,500 · Arts & CultureASHEVILLE AREA ARTS COUNCIL: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,250 · HealthMITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$179,250Philanthropy$126,000Science & Tech$120,000Animals$38,000Education$35,000Arts & Culture$28,500Health$15,250Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $126,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $120,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $61,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAsheville Art Museum Association Inc: $18,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $17,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC: $15,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMITCHELL COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $13,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetASHEVILLE AREA ARTS COUNCIL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Asheville Art Museum Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE AREA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Samuel L Phillips Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frank and Mary Lamberson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frank and Mary Lamberson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frank and Mary Lamberson’s filings →

More from the funding graph