Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frank and Lillian Lee Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$119kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$1kHealth$310Recreation & Sports$300Education$200
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$300
Median grant
3
States reached
$366k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH$10,700
NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN$1,000
STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES$500
CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY$500
CHRISTOPHER SUN EVANGELISTIC ASSN$300
LA OPEN TABLE TENNIS$300
LA LITTLE ANGELS CHILDREN'S CHORALE$300
LOGOS EVANGELICAL SEMINARY$300
GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER$300
FAMILY KEEPERS INC$300
TOUCH LIFE MISSION$300
AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST$200
SAINT NECTARIOS ORTHODOX CHURCH$200
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSITAL$10
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST: $200 → 9%CXCY FOR BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY MISSI: $400 → 7%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $300 → 10%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%FAMILY KEEPERS INC: $300 → 14%GLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $300 → 10%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%FAMILY KEEPERS INC: $300 → 14%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%CHRISTOPHER SUN EVANGELISTIC ASSN: $300 → 14%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%CHRISTOPHER SUN EVANGELISTIC ASSN: $300 → 14%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%CEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $500 → 14%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $15k → 14%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $15k → 14%STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%LOGOS EVANGELICAL SEMINARY: $300 → 14%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $12k → 14%LOGOS EVANGELICAL SEMINARY: $300 → 14%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $12k → 14%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $11k → 14%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $11k → 14%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $10k → 14%EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $8k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%POMONA VALLEY HOSPITAL: $300 → 14%LA LITTLE ANGELS CHILDREN'S CHORALE: $300 → 14%TOUCH LIFE MISSION: $500 → 14%TOUCH LIFE MISSION: $300 → 14%TOUCH LIFE MISSION: $300 → 14%LA OPEN TABLE TENNIS: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 13 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$120k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-21%

Still filing today

38%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $810 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +109%
  • SO
    STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +63%
  • FK
    FAMILY KEEPERS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • PV
    POMONA VALLEY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $300
  • LL
    LIFE LIGHT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $200 · revenue -21%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR TAIWANESE STUDIES
    one grant, 2018 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—
2
Logos Taiwan

The specific purpose of this corporation is tosupport, train & develop pastors, ministers, and church leaders for the Evangelical Formosan Church and other Christian denominations.

Religion
3
Vision for Asia

Christian Ministry Activities

Religion
4
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
5
Da Los Angeles Church Network

To assist small Chinese churches in growth, breakthrough, and support ministers financially; to advance God's kingdom ministry via multimedia.

Religion
6
Systematic Asian Leadership Trainin

Religious training: to assist the church in asia by training its leaders and equipping them to train others.

Religion
7
Christian Mission to the Orient

The organization is a missionary sending/sponsoring organizations that engage in Christian evangelism and training leaders for the churches in SE Asia

—
8
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

—
9
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
10
Overseas Radio and Television Inc

To support our ministry in Taipei in their mission of sharing the Gospel with Chinese people, assisting other churches and Non-Governmental Organizations in Taiwan.

Arts & Culture
11
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
12
Chinese Christian Mission Inc

To reach out to the chinese worldwide in local evangelism and foreign missions. this purpose is facilitated through the use of missionaries, evangelism training and literature.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ambassadors for Christ Inc; the most unlike its peers is La Open Table Tennis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HH: $94,000 · OtherEVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF HHCEDAR MUSIC MINISTRY: $4,000 · Other+13 more: $5,500 · OtherNORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $8,000 · ReligionNORTHWEST ASCE…STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $4,000 · ReligionSTREAM OF PRAI…TOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE: $1,700 · ReligionTOUCH LIFE MIS…FAMILY KEEPERS INC: $1,400 · ReligionFAMILY KEEPERS…AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $1,000 · ReligionAMBASSADORS FO…Logos Evangelical Seminary: $1,600 · EducationLIFE LIGHT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $200 · EducationLA OPEN TABLE TENNIS: $300 · Recreation & SportsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10 · Health
Other$103,500Religion$16,100Education$1,800Recreation & Sports$300Health$10

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN: $8,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSTREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE: $1,700 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLogos Evangelical Seminary: $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY KEEPERS INC: $1,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $1,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE LIGHT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST ASCENDING CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE ↗
  • Who funds Logos Evangelical Seminary ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY KEEPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds LA OPEN TABLE TENNIS ↗
  • Who funds LIFE LIGHT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

MY Charitable FoundationDE22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: MY Charitable Foundation · King & Joy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frank and Lillian Lee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frank and Lillian Lee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank and Lillian Lee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph