Skip to content
The Frank a O'Neil Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Frank a O'Neil Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$242kHuman Services$110kReligion$101kHousing & Shelter$51kArts & Culture$34kCrime & Legal$29kCivil Rights$8kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$754k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$25,000
UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$12,500
FAMILY TREE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL$6,000
ST JOHN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$5,000
GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER$5,000
HUNT COUNTY SHARES MINISTRIES$4,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDA$3,500
INDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER$3,500
TETON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$3,500
ANNIE'S PLACE$3,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,000
ANGEL EYES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY TREE: $12k → 7%FAMILY TREE: $12k → 7%MOMMIES IN NEED: $2k → 14%FAMILY TREE: $12k → 7%FAMILY TREE: $12k → 7%MOMMIES IN NEED: $2k → 14%FAMILY TREE: $10k → 7%FAMILY TREE: $10k → 7%ONE 22 RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 5%ONE 22 RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 5%MOMMIES IN NEED: $500 → 14%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $1k → 15%ONE 22 RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 5%DREAM FUND: $1k → 14%DREAM FUND: $1k → 14%ONE 22 RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 5%ONE 22 RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 5%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $500 → 15%ONE 22: $1k → 5%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $4k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $4k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
WY
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
NC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$577k · 31 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
23

Total granted

$577k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+7%

Still filing today

61%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FAMILY TREE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $66k · revenue +24%
  • LC
    LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER
    5× · 2019–2023 · $31k · revenue +22%
  • SJ
    St John's Health Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $29k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • GA
    GOODLAND ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -35%
  • IC
    Illuminate Coloradograduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
Denver Indian Health and Family Ser

To provide culturally competent services that promote quality health for american indian and alaskan native families and individuals in the denver area.

Human Services
4
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
7
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
8
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
9
Denver Children's Advocacy Center

Dcac works to improve the lives of children traumatized by sexual abuse, neglect and violence-as well as those who are at high-risk with prevention, education, and direct services. our mission is to prevent abuse strengthen families…

Employment
10
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
11
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
12
Health Services of North Texas Inc

Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Angel Eyes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
26/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $129,500 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $41,800 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $32,000 · OtherGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTERLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $30,500 · OtherLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTERUNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherUNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHVNA: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · Other+32 more: $62,500 · Other+32 moreFAMILY TREE INC: $66,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE INCDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $21,500 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S AD…One22 Inc: $14,500 · Human ServicesOne22 IncMOMMIES IN NEED: $4,500 · Human Services+3 more: $4,250 · Human ServicesSt John's Health Foundation: $28,500 · HealthSt John's Health …Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $18,150 · HealthChildren's Hospit…TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15,500 · HealthTETON YOUTH AND F…JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $14,000 · HealthJEFFERSON CENTER …THE JED FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATIO…+6 more: $9,250 · Health+6 moreGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureTACA INC: $14,500 · Arts & CulturePROMISE HOUSE INC: $18,500 · Housing & ShelterHUNT COUNTY SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $6,500 · ReligionIlluminate Colorado: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$346,300Human Services$110,750Health$94,400Arts & Culture$32,500Housing & Shelter$18,500Religion$6,500Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $66,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $30,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation: $28,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE HOUSE INC: $18,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $18,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTACA INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOne22 Inc: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetINDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER: $7,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHUNT COUNTY SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOMMIES IN NEED: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM FUND: $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIlluminate Colorado: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Eyes: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROKEN ARROW NEIGHBORS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTWO ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WHEELING INC: $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTeton County Library Foundation & Friends: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Sports Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LOUISIANA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TACA INC ↗
  • Who funds One22 Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HUNT COUNTY SHARED MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOMMIES IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAM FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Illuminate Colorado ↗
  • Who funds Angel Eyes ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

August J & Thelma S H…Raymond A & Gertrude …Texas Instruments Fou…Helen J Prince Founda…Harry and Helen Sands…Robinson S Parlin Tru…Rosemary M Front Char…Vna Home Support Serv…Ann Sonneborn Charita…The Driehorst Family …Stamp 2001 Charitable…Francis J and Edith J…
August J & Thelma S Hoffmann FoundationWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee · Harry and Helen Sands Charitable Trust · Robinson S Parlin Trust · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · Vna Home Support Services Inc · Ann Sonneborn Charitable Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frank a O'Neil Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frank a O'Neil Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank a O'Neil Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home