Skip to content

West Virginia · Private foundation

Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2025
9
Organizations funded FY2024
11%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 11
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$887k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 11% of the organizations Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 11% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$42k13%
FY20249$45k11%
FY20236$46k17%
FY20229$50k22%
FY202111$44k9%
FY20208$44k63%
FY20197$44k14%
FY20187$43k29%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$82kYouth Development$79kEducation$78kHuman Services$39kHealth$34kArts & Culture$33kFood & Nutrition$30kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($107k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYouth Services System Inc: $36,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWheeling Health Right Inc: $34,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOglebay Institute: $32,700 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWheeling Country Day School: $32,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe House of the Carpenter Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOglebay Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWest Liberty University Foundation Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe King's Daughters Child Care Centers Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHelping Heroes Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Soup Kitchen of Greater Wheeling Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCatholic Charities West Virginia Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Womens Christian Association of Wheeling Wv: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer FoundationWV26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company · Hess Family Foundation · Robert L and Helen E Levenson Family Charit Fndtn · Robinson S Parlin Trust · Robert L& Helen E Levenson Family Charitable Tr · Vna Home Support Services Inc · The Driehorst Family Foundation · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust with peer funders

About Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust

How much does Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust give?
Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust reported 8 grants totaling $42,100 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (20%), Youth Development (20%), Education (19%).
Who are Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Temple Shalom ($82k), Youth Services System Inc ($36k), Wheeling Health Right Inc ($34k).
Does Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation, Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust, August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation.
Where is Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust based?
Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust is based in WV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosemary M Front’s filings →

More from the funding graph