· Private foundation
Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEMPLE SHALOM | $15,000 |
| WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $6,000 |
| WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT | $5,000 |
| THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER | $5,000 |
| WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $4,000 |
| OGLEBAY INSTITUTE | $3,100 |
| YOUNG LIFE OHIO VALLEY | $3,000 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YSYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC6× · 2018–2024 · $36k · revenue +28%
- WHWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +24%
- OIOGLEBAY INSTITUTE8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $18k
- HHHELPING HEROES INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -7%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INCone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide care to childen and their families through a range of services that promote healthy growth and improve the quality of family life
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
To help disabled and handicapped individuals to live in the least restrictive settings.
St john's home for children is a leader in delivering innovative and therapeutic services, in collaboration with our community partners and resources, to promote healing and growth for our children and family prosperity and resilience.
The westchester institute for human development (wihd) creates better futures for people with disabilities, for vulnerable children, and for their families and caregivers. wihd accomplishes its mission through professional education,…
To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.
The organization is a community-based mutual-aid nonprofit, providing supplies and support to people experiencing homelessness and advocating for compassionate, just, and collaborative solutions to homelessness.
Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…
Providing affordable housing for those in life transition
Alcohol and drug rehabilitation
To advance housing and human services to the homeless and to educate the community on the plight of homelessness in the area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheeling Health Right Inc and the most unlike its peers is Society of St Vincent Depaul Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company · Hess Family Foundation · Robert L and Helen E Levenson Family Charit Fndtn · Robinson S Parlin Trust · Robert L& Helen E Levenson Family Charitable Tr · Vna Home Support Services Inc · The Driehorst Family Foundation · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.