· Private foundation
The Frank a O'Neil Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of THE FRANK A O'NEIL FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $25,000 |
| UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $12,500 |
| FAMILY TREE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,000 |
| GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL | $6,000 |
| GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER | $5,000 |
| DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $5,000 |
| ST JOHN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HUNT COUNTY SHARES MINISTRIES | $4,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDA | $3,500 |
| INDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER | $3,500 |
| TETON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES | $3,500 |
| ANNIE'S PLACE | $3,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $3,000 |
| ONE 22 RESOURCE CENTER | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFAMILY TREE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $66k · revenue +24%
- LCLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER5× · 2019–2023 · $31k · revenue +22%
- SJSt John's Health Foundation6× · 2019–2024 · $29k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- GAGOODLAND ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $3k
- ASAMERICAN SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -35%
- ICIlluminate Coloradograduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Children's services
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
To provide culturally competent services that promote quality health for american indian and alaskan native families and individuals in the denver area.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
Dcac works to improve the lives of children traumatized by sexual abuse, neglect and violence-as well as those who are at high-risk with prevention, education, and direct services. our mission is to prevent abuse strengthen families…
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.
Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Angel Eyes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROMISE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TACA INC ↗
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds INDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HUNT COUNTY SHARED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MOMMIES IN NEED ↗
- Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM FUND ↗
- Who funds Angel Eyes ↗
- Who funds Illuminate Colorado ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LEGACY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee · Harry and Helen Sands Charitable Trust · Robinson S Parlin Trust · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · Vna Home Support Services Inc · Ann Sonneborn Charitable Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Frank a O'Neil Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.