· Private foundation
Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of FRANCIS J AND EDITH JACKSON FOUNDA SECURITY NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $194k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA | $20,000 |
| WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC | $15,000 |
| WVNCC FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| BELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER | $15,000 |
| NORTH WHEELING COMM YOUTH CENTER | $15,000 |
| APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC | $15,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICES UPPER OHIO VALLEY | $15,000 |
| SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELIN | $13,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY WHEELING | $11,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY | $10,000 |
| OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK | $10,000 |
| LAUGHLIN MEMORIAL CHAPEL | $10,000 |
| HOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - FOOD | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WLWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $114k · revenue +125%
- YSYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC8× · 2018–2025 · $92k · revenue +28%
- THTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC8× · 2018–2025 · $77k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- TCTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY AMAZING RAISE LOCAL INCENTITIVone grant, 2018 · $5k
- BLBUCKEYE LOCAL SCHOOLSone grant, 2020 · $2k
- MAMOUNTAINEER AUTISM PROJECTone grant, 2018 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.
Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.
To provide personal care and counseling services for the development of wholesome family life
Distribution of food to those in need.
Provide meal delivery service to seniors and adult day program participants.
Meals on wheels of greater lynchburg addresses the hunger, isolation, and unique needs of the homebound. driven by volunteers who embody compassionate care, meals on wheels strengthens our community by delivering hot, nutritious meals,…
Mowhc supports individuals who are elderly, disabled, and homebound by delivering nutritious meals, reducing hunger, improving health and promoting independence.
Meals on wheels is the leading privately funded organization promoting dignity and independent living for the homebound, through volunteer delivery of nutritious meals in the greater indianapolis area.
Whole life services, inc.'s daily operations are motivated by and driven by persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (id/dd), their families, and others in the community supporting their lives. in order to empower people to…
Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency serves the disadvantaged people by determining their needs; advocating for and providing programs that help remove them from the causes of poverty.
Provide residential and human services to individuals with developmental disabilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mountaineer Autism Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE HUB INC ↗
- Who funds CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINEER AUTISM PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Vna Home Support Services Inc · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Hess Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · Helping Hand Foundation · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.