Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Francis L Lederer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$413kHealth$211kEducation$159kPhilanthropy$88kReligion$56kFood & Nutrition$39kInternational$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $132k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$15,000
CHICAGO SCHOLARS$15,000
ERIKSON INSTITUTE$12,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MIDWEST REGION$10,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON$10,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF CHICAGO$10,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$10,000
WTTW CHANNEL 11$10,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON$10,000
LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES$7,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$5,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%GLOBAL GIVING: $10k → 14%ZACHARIAS CENTER: $10k → 8%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MIDWEST REGION: $10k → 8%WTTW CHANNEL 11: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MIDWEST REGION: $10k → 8%WTTW CHANNEL 11: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MIDWEST REGION: $10k → 8%WTTW CHANNEL 11: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MIDWEST REGION: $10k → 8%WTTW CHANNEL 11: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MIDWEST REGION: $10k → 8%WTTW CHANNEL 11: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%WTTW CHANNEL 11: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $10k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS: $15k → 14%ERIKSON INSTITUTE: $12k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $20k → 14%CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $20k → 14%CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $15k → 14%CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $15k → 14%CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $15k → 14%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 18 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$1.0M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+44%

Still filing today

56%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON
    7× · 2019–2025 · $145k · revenue +33%
  • TC
    THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +21%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Institute of Medicine of Chicago

Mission - the institute of medicine of chicago is an independent non-profit organization of distinguished leaders in the health field who collaborate to improve the health of the public. drawing upon the expertise of a diverse membership…

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
9
The Carle Foundation Hospital

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Legacy Community Health Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $75,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INCWTTW CHANNEL 11: $65,000 · OtherWTTW CHANNEL 11UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MIDWEST REGION: $64,000 · OtherUNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM - MI…Individual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientZACHARIAS CENTER: $45,500 · OtherZACHARIAS CENTERThe Houston Food Bank: $35,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF CHICAGO: $30,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART OF CHICAGOUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $25,000 · Other+5 moreTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $105,000 · EducationTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDA…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $100,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAG…Erikson Institute: $54,000 · EducationErikson InstituteTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $145,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF F…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $70,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S …LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $43,000 · HealthLEGACY COMMU…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $70,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UN…CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNI…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII CO…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyMedical Bridges Inc: $27,500 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · International
Other$408,500Education$259,000Arts & Culture$145,000Health$113,500Philanthropy$88,000International$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $100,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $70,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetErikson Institute: $54,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $43,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMedical Bridges Inc: $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Erikson Institute ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Medical Bridges Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Francis L Lederer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Francis L Lederer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Francis L Lederer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Francis L Lederer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Francis L Lederer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph