· Private foundation
The Frances and Craig Lindner Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+2 grants · $525k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HORIZON COMMUNITY CHURCH | $275,000 |
| JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $250,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $50,000 |
| ARTSWAVE | $25,000 |
| ENSWORTH SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE TRUST | $25,000 |
| CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| LIFE LEARNING CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME OF CINCINNATI OHIO INC | $20,000 |
| TAFT MUSEUM OF ART | $10,000 |
| THE STORE | $10,000 |
| NAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES MASSACHUSETTS BAY COUNCIL | $2,500 |
| CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL ESSENTIAL TREMOR FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $219k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2023 · $4.2M · revenue +30%
- JFJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +28%
- FTFORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +3%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INCone grant, 2018 · $113k · revenue +3%
- ESELIZABETH'S SMILE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $110k · revenue -96%
- LFLITTLE FORK FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Perform fundraising functions, provide financial support, carryout the purpose and otherwise operating for the benefit of the zoological society of cincinnati.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.
The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…
To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…
Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…
The UWGC Foundation provides a flexible vehicle to perpetuate financial support of UWGC, its initiatives, its agencies, and the human services they provide.
To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Cincinnati Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Turner Farm Preservation Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds FORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE GREAT SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH'S SMILE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Life Learning Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE FORK FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc ↗
- Who funds OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Dress for Success Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Miami University Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio ↗
- Who funds THE ENSWORTH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR MEDICAL RELIEF ↗
- Who funds BRING CHANGE 2 MIND ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE STORE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Farmer Family Foundation · Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Hcs Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Bahl Family Foundation · The Carl H and Edyth B Lindner Foundation · The Wyler Family Foundation · Millstone Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Frances and Craig Lindner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Frances and Craig Lindner Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Frances and Craig Lindner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.