Skip to content

· Public charity

The Food Trust

THE FOOD TRUST (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and other diet-related diseases through innovative programs to increase access to fresh food and provide…

$502k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$2.2MCommunity Improvement$74k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $476k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUNIR FOOD INC$45,000
LEMON & LIME LLC$45,000
TCG GROCERIES$45,000
VINE FARMERS MARKET CORP$45,000
ENIOLA AFRICAN STORE LLC$40,000
POR GRACIA SOY SALVO GROCERY CORP$40,000
Y&F SUPERMARKET LLC$40,000
DELIAH & DEAN LLC$40,000
UNCLE MUSA GROCERY INC$35,000
VEGGIEHOUSE FARM LLC$20,000
GREATER READING CHAMBER ALLIANCE$15,707
URBAN SEEDS GROW$15,000
INTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC$15,000
CROPS$15,000
MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD COUNCIL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CROSS LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

3%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 3 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
38

Total granted

$75k
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-24%

Still filing today

100%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $455k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Food & NutritionCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +30%
  • GR
    GREATER READING CHAMBER & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $24k · revenue +4%
  • WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • WF
    WHOLE FOOD COOPERATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • SM
    SALEM'S MARKET CENTRE LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • KS
    KING SUPER MARKET FOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

—
2
Common Good City Farm

Common Good City Farm is an urban farm in Washington, DC, where community members source fresh food, see sustainable urban agriculture in action, and learn healthy skills. Our mission is to sustain and support a more equitable community…

Food & Nutrition
3
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Food Connections Inc

Support small farms and other businesses. Bring sustainable healthy products to the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
New Jersey Food Council Inc

To provide vision and leadership to advance the interest of the food industry in new jersey.

—
6
The Farm Collaborative

Growing a local food system where the health of people and planet come first

Education
7
Local Food Solutions

We work to expand access to local food for more people in the community through the purchase, aggregation, storage, marketing and delivery of fresh, safe, local food in partnership with local growers.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Common Market Philadelphia Inc

The organization is a non-profit that distributes local and sustainably produced foods. the organization's public purpose is to implement education programs that improve access to local foods for residents of underserved low income…

Human Services
10
Farmers Market Fund

Helping under-served populations in oregon with greater access to healthy, locally grown food.

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Farmers Markets Inc

To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…

Food & Nutrition
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Revolutionizing Open Public Spaces; the most unlike its peers is Tcg Groceries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHOLE FOOD COOPERATIVE: $150,000 · OtherWHOLE FOOD COOPERATIVESALEM'S MARKET CENTRE LLC: $150,000 · OtherSALEM'S MARKET CENTRE LLCKING SUPER MARKET FOOD: $100,000 · OtherCHANDI SUPERMARKET: $100,000 · Other+42 more: $1,561,650 · Other+42 moreTCG GROCERIES: $45,000 · Food & NutritionYORK FRESH FOOD FARMS: $40,000 · Food & NutritionMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD COUNCIL INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER READING CHAMBER & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $23,707 · Community ImprovementTHE COOPERAGE PROJECT: $35,000 · Arts & CultureWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $21,000 · EducationCommunities Revolutionizing Open Public Spaces: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $5,130 · Human Services
Other$2,061,650Food & Nutrition$115,000Community Improvement$48,707Arts & Culture$35,000Education$21,000Philanthropy$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Human Services$5,130

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTCG GROCERIES: $45,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetYORK FRESH FOOD FARMS: $40,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTHE COOPERAGE PROJECT: $35,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD COUNCIL INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER READING CHAMBER & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $23,707 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunities Revolutionizing Open Public Spaces: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetINTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $5,130 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TCG GROCERIES ↗
  • Who funds YORK FRESH FOOD FARMS ↗
  • Who funds THE COOPERAGE PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Reinvestment Fund IncPA14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Reinvestment Fund Inc · Pennsylvania Cdfi Network · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Food Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Food Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Interfaith Neighbors Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Communities Revolutionizing Open Public Spaces: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Food’s filings →

More from the funding graph