· Private foundation
The Fonvielle Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MACLAY SCHOOL | $69,205 |
| ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $29,367 |
| FSU FOUNDATION | $23,402 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $7,500 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| ELEPHANT AID INTERNATIONAL | $2,500 |
| GOODWOOD MUSEUM | $1,235 |
| SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND | $1,200 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE | $1,030 |
| LEON COUNTY SCHOOLS | $500 |
| TMH FOUNDATION | $300 |
| TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $300 |
| RED HILLS SMALL FARM ALLIANCE | $300 |
| TMH DIABETES CENTER | $300 |
| ALS HOPE FOUNDATION | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The Florida State University Foundation Inc4× · 2019–2024 · $133k · revenue +51%- ABALFRED B MACLAY JR DAY SCHOOL6× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +45%
- TMTALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +1%
Funded once
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -36%- GWGULF WINDS TRACK CLUB INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +491%
- BABALLET ARTS CONSERVATORYone grant, 2021 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives
Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
Please see schedule o
To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…
We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.
The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Big Bend Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Florida State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ALFRED B MACLAY JR DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BIG BEND INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MAKING MIRACLES GROUP HOME ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ECHO Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Big Bend Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds GULF WINDS TRACK CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
- Who funds HANG TOUGH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY CARE HELP ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RED HILLS SMALL FARM ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Capital City Bank Group Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Florida Inc · Capital Health Plan Inc · Guy & Therese de la Valdene Family Foundation Inc · United Way of the Big Bend Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fonvielle Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Legal Services of North Florida Inc — 27% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- United Way of the Big Bend Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.