Skip to content
The Floyd a & Frieda S Guynn Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Floyd a & Frieda S Guynn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$64kHuman Services$58kFood & Nutrition$50kHealth$40kHousing & Shelter$31kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$825k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORVILLA INC$11,000
WABASH COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC$10,000
WHITES RESIDENTIAL AND FAMILY SERVICES I$10,000
HOMEBOUND MEALS INC$10,000
MAKE-A-WISH OH KY AND IN$5,000
SERVANTS AT WORK INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%CORVILLA INC: $11k → 13%SERVANTS AT WORK INC: $5k → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK INC: $4k → 16%WHITES RESIDENTIAL AND FAMILY SERVICES I: $10k → 12%WHITES RESIDENTIAL AND FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 12%WHITES RESIDENTIAL AND FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 12%WHITES RESIDENTIAL AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 7 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$189k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+5%

Still filing today

100%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    Homebound Meals Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +1%
  • WC
    WABASH COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +44%
  • WR
    WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • B
    BRAVEHOODS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -118%
  • TW
    THE WABASH WOMAN'S CLUB HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • WC
    WABASH COUNTY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Residential Services Inc

Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.

Health
2
New Hope of Indiana Inc

New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.

—
3
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

—
4
Homes for Independence Inc

To provide low-income housing to individuals with severe disabilities.

Housing & Shelter
5
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Respite Care Services Inc

To provide respite care. respite care services provides care relief to families with developmentally or physically disabled family members with the goal of delaying or avoiding institutionalization.

Human Services
8
Bosma Industries for the Blind Inc

Bosma enterprises, creating opportunities for individuals who are blind or visually impaired.

Employment
9
Wabash Valley Goodwill Inc

Goodwill industries is a nonprofit provider of employment and other critical community based services for people who have a disability, people who lack education or job experience, households facing economic challenges, and others in need.

Employment
10
Brian's House Inc

Brian's House specializes in the care and treatment of people with disabilities. Brian's House provides a broad range of human services to people with special needs and challenges. The primary goal is to maximize each individual's…

Human Services
11
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
12
Our House Inc

Providing opportunities and environments to build bright futures. Our House provides residential and Day Program Services to adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The focus is on building independent living skills,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is White's Residential & Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bravehoods. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Homebound Meals Inc: $50,000 · OtherHomebound Meals IncBRAVEHOODS: $10,000 · OtherBRAVEHOODSTHE WABASH WOMAN'S CLUB HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherTHE WABASH WOMAN'S CLUB HOUSEWABASH COUNTY MUSEUM: $7,500 · OtherWABASH COUNTY MUSEUMSAINT ANNE HOME AND RETIRMENT COMMUNITY: $5,000 · OtherSAINT ANNE HOME AND RETIRMENT COMMUNITYMAKE-A-WISH OH KY AND IN: $5,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH OH KY AND INMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY AND IN: $5,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY AND INWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $28,500 · Human ServicesWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & …CORVILLA INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesCORVILLA INCServants at Work Inc: $9,000 · Human ServicesServants at Work IncWABASH COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureWABASH COUNTY…REINS AND RAINBOWS INC: $30,000 · HealthREINS AND RAI…THE HONEYWELL FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HONEYWE…CASS HOUSING INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterQuesta Education Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Education
Other$92,500Human Services$48,500Arts & Culture$30,000Health$30,000Philanthropy$26,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHomebound Meals Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetWABASH COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetREINS AND RAINBOWS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $28,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HONEYWELL FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASS HOUSING INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBRAVEHOODS: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetServants at Work Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetQuesta Education Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Leah M Sundheimer…English-Bonter-Mitche…Kuhne Charles Char Fd…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Leah M Sundheimer FoundationMO15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Leah M Sundheimer Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Kuhne Charles Char Fdn T-W Main · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Floyd a & Frieda S Guynn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Floyd a & Frieda S Guynn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Floyd a & Frieda S Guynn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home