· Private foundation
The Floyd a & Frieda S Guynn Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORVILLA INC | $11,000 |
| WABASH COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC | $10,000 |
| HOMEBOUND MEALS INC | $10,000 |
| WHITES RESIDENTIAL AND FAMILY SERVICES I | $10,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH OH KY AND IN | $5,000 |
| SERVANTS AT WORK INC | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHomebound Meals Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +23%
- WCWABASH COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +44%
- WRWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC4× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- BBRAVEHOODSone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -118%
- TWTHE WABASH WOMAN'S CLUB HOUSEone grant, 2023 · $10k
- WCWABASH COUNTY MUSEUMone grant, 2022 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.
New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.
Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.
To provide low-income housing to individuals with severe disabilities.
Provide services in response to individual need
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
To provide respite care. respite care services provides care relief to families with developmentally or physically disabled family members with the goal of delaying or avoiding institutionalization.
Bosma enterprises, creating opportunities for individuals who are blind or visually impaired.
Goodwill industries is a nonprofit provider of employment and other critical community based services for people who have a disability, people who lack education or job experience, households facing economic challenges, and others in need.
Brian's House specializes in the care and treatment of people with disabilities. Brian's House provides a broad range of human services to people with special needs and challenges. The primary goal is to maximize each individual's…
We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.
Providing opportunities and environments to build bright futures. Our House provides residential and Day Program Services to adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The focus is on building independent living skills,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is White's Residential & Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bravehoods. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Homebound Meals Inc ↗
- Who funds WABASH COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds REINS AND RAINBOWS INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE HONEYWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CASS HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds CORVILLA INC ↗
- Who funds BRAVEHOODS ↗
- Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
- Who funds Questa Education Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Leah M Sundheimer Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Kuhne Charles Char Fdn T-W Main · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Floyd a & Frieda S Guynn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.