Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Firoz and Najma Lalji Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$3.1MHealth$646kPhilanthropy$643kArts & Culture$443kInternational$152kRecreation & Sports$25kHousing & Shelter$10kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $170k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$39,547
Median grant
2
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Washington Foundation$2,000,000
Overlake Medical Center Foundation$170,000
LSE Foundation$39,547
Seattle Art Museum$28,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Program for African Leadership$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LSE Foundation: $40k → 17%Pippen's Place: $3k → 14%NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC: $1k → 14%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $139k → 9%LSE Foundation: $12k → 17%SEATTLE OPERA: $82k → 9%LSE Foundation: $4k → 17%Seattle Art Museum: $72k → 9%LSE Foundation: $3k → 17%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $39k → 9%Seattle Art Museum: $28k → 9%Seattle Art Museum: $27k → 9%Friends of Waterfront Park: $25k → 9%Seattle Art Museum: $12k → 9%Seattle Art Museum: $4k → 9%Overlake Medical Center Foundation: $170k → 9%Overlake Medical Center Foundation: $170k → 9%Overlake Medical Center Foundation: $120k → 9%Overlake Medical Center Foundation: $50k → 9%Overlake Medical Center Foundation: $50k → 9%CONGREGATIONS FFOR THE HOMELESS: $10k → 9%Overlake Medical Center Foundation: $9k → 9%Program for African Leadership: $1k → 9%Gage Academy of Art: $10k → 9%GAGE ACADEMY OF ART: $10k → 9%GAGE ACADEMY OF ART: $10k → 9%Gage Academy of Art: $10k → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $2.0M → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $1.0M → 9%UW FOUNDATION: $35k → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $13k → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $13k → 9%UW FOUNDATION: $11k → 9%University of Washington Foundation: $9k → 9%UNITED WAY KING COUNTY: $200k → 9%PACIFIC NW BALLET: $26k → 9%United Way of King County: $200k → 9%Pacific NW Ballet: $12k → 9%United Way of King County: $200k → 9%Pacific NW Ballet: $10k → 9%OVERLAKE HOSPITAL: $50k → 9%PACIFIC NW BALLET: $4k → 9%UNITED WAY KING COUNTY: $43k → 9%Pacific NW Ballet: $500 → 9%OVERLAKE HOSPITAL: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 10 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$4.9M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-23%

Still filing today

60%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyInternationalHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +46%
  • OH
    OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $569k · revenue +61%
  • GAGE ACADEMY OF ART
    4× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • SO
    SEATTLE OPERA
    one grant, 2018 · $82k · revenue -23%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -48%
  • CF
    CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
2
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
3
Seattle International Soccer Local Organizing Committee

Seattle international soccer local organizing committee exists to use the incredible platform of soccer (including the 2026 fifa world cup(tm)) to enrich and enhance the lives of everyone who visits or lives in the state of washington and…

Community Improvement
4
Friends of Kexp

Kexp's mission is to enrich your life by championing music and discovery.

Youth Development
5
Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Seattle Chapter

Arcs foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete degrees in science, engineering and medical research.

Education
6
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
7
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
8
Independent Colleges of Washington

Independent colleges of washington is the leading advocate for not-for-profit, private campuses in washington state.

Education
9
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
10
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
11
Seattle University Foundation

Fundraising activities to support Seattle University

—
12
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Art Museum; the most unlike its peers is Program for African Leadership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $3,080,776 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $642,551 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF …OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $568,930 · HealthOVERLAKE HOS…SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $319,739 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE A…SEATTLE OPERA: $82,449 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE O…GAGE ACADEMY OF ART: $40,000 · Arts & CultureGAGE ACAD…LSE FOUNDATION: $150,686 · InternationalOVERLAKE HOSPITAL: $55,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $52,224 · OtherLIONS GATEHOSPITAL: $13,792 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $8,600 · OtherLions Gate Hospital Foundation: $7,912 · Other+4 more: $4,890 · OtherFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $25,000 · Community ImprovementCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$3,080,776Philanthropy$642,551Health$568,930Arts & Culture$442,188International$150,686Other$142,578Community Improvement$25,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $3,080,776 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $642,551 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $568,930 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $319,739 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLSE FOUNDATION: $150,686 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetSEATTLE OPERA: $82,449 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGAGE ACADEMY OF ART: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds LSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds GAGE ACADEMY OF ART ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe FoundationWA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Firoz and Najma Lalji Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Firoz and Najma Lalji Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Firoz and Najma Lalji Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Firoz and Najma Lalji Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Firoz and Najma Lalji’s filings →

    More from the funding graph