Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fermata Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$1.8MHealth$133kFood & Nutrition$132kHousing & Shelter$115kHuman Services$53kArts & Culture$39kEnvironment$18kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Paul Lutheran Church$85,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$25,000
DuPage PADS Inc$18,000
NAMI Johnson County$10,000
Shelter House$10,000
NAMI DuPage Community Center$8,000
Zion Lutheran Church$6,000
Bridge Communities$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
New Moms$4,000
Roger Baldwin Foundation (ACLU)$2,000
Breakthrough T1D$2,000
Outreach House$2,000
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network$1,000
SCARCE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $5k → 9%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 9%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 9%MATTHEW 25: $1k → 9%Misericordia Foundation: $4k → 14%OUTREACH HOUSE: $5k → 7%OUTREACH HOUSE: $2k → 7%New Moms: $4k → 14%Outreach House: $2k → 7%Outreach House: $2k → 7%NAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY: $8k → 7%Outreach House: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
NY
IA
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 31 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
18

Total granted

$2.5M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+43%

Still filing today

61%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $147k · revenue +47%
  • DP
    DUPAGE PADS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $99k · revenue +149%
  • BC
    BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $38k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • NO
    NAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOISgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +87%
  • AC
    AUGUSTANA COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +27%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
3
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
4
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
5
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
6
University of Illinois Alumni Association

The mission of the university of illinois alumni association is to enhance and advance the relationship between the university of illinois at urbana-champaign (the university) and all its alumni; to inspire lifelong loyalty and pride among…

—
7
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
8
Illinois Manufacturers' Association

To strengthen the economic social environmental and governmental conditions for manufacturing and allied enterprises in the state of illinois, resulting in an englarged business base and increased employment.

—
9
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
10
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Moms Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
26/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1,899,620 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH+35 more: $269,000 · Other+35 moreNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $147,000 · Food & NutritionDUPAGE PADS INC: $99,000 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $37,500 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS-IOWA INC: $22,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $13,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $9,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE OUTREACH HOUSE: $13,000 · Human ServicesCATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesNAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS: $8,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INC: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSCARCE: $18,000 · EnvironmentTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $5,000 · Education
Other$2,168,620Food & Nutrition$147,000Housing & Shelter$136,500Health$49,000Human Services$41,000Environment$18,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $147,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $99,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS JOHNSON COUNTY: $36,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS-IOWA INC: $22,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSCARCE: $18,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OUTREACH HOUSE: $13,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHELTER HOUSE COMMUNITY SHELTER AND TRANSITION SERVICES: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ILLINOIS: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Gardenworks Project: $7,500 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE ENGLERT CIVIC THEATRE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED AFRICAN ORGANIZATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN DAU FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATTHEW 25: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE PADS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS JOHNSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS-IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds SCARCE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds THE OUTREACH HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER HOUSE COMMUNITY SHELTER AND TRANSITION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds The Gardenworks Project ↗
  • Who funds THE ENGLERT CIVIC THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED AFRICAN ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Johnson CountyIA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Johnson County · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · GreenState Credit Union · Hawkeye Area Community Action Program Inc · Washington County Riverboat Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · The Dupage Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Edward Jones Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fermata Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fermata Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fermata’s filings →

    More from the funding graph