Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fellowship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$73kPhilanthropy$36kHuman Services$24kEducation$18kHousing & Shelter$17kYouth Development$11kHealth$11kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
$300
Median grant
11
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ASSISTED FUND$32,193
SALVATION ARMY$1,750
OPEN DOOR MISSION$1,750
CLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER$1,410
DOWNING STREET FOUNDATION$1,410
NEW HEIGHTS CHURCH$1,400
ST THERESA CHURCH$1,400
ST JAMES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE$1,000
BELLEVUE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,000
CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH$815
UNBOUND$480
IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FNDN$300
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$250
DRAKE LAW SCHOOL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%UNBOUND: $480 → 16%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%ICA FOOD SHELF: $853 → 11%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%ICA FOOD SHELF: $670 → 11%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $2k → 12%SHARING CARING HANDS: $500 → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FT WORTH: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
SD
IA
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
MD
KS
AR
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$134k · 46 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
48

Total granted

$134k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+52%

Still filing today

43%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +23%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +60%
  • DS
    Downing Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UMC HOT SPRINGS
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • HS
    HOT SPRINGS BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
5
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
8
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
9
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
10
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Messianic Jewish Bible Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ASSISTED FUND: $32,193 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ASSISTED FUNDST JAMES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $16,770 · OtherST JAMES UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $15,630 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFIRST UMC HOT SPRINGS: $14,500 · OtherFIRST UMC HOT SPRINGSHOT SPRINGS BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherHOT SPRINGS BOYS & GIRLS CLUBCLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER: $8,460 · OtherBELLEVUE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7,000 · Other+74 more: $60,647 · Other+74 moreOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $15,700 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR …INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $1,523 · Human ServicesINTERCONGR…+4 more: $1,280 · Human Services+4 moreChristian Research Institute Inc: $9,000 · ReligionA3: $960 · ReligionUNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS: $3,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $550 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $500 · EducationFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE LAB INC: $300 · Education+3 more: $300 · EducationDowning Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr: $2,910 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $200 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,700 · EnvironmentSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $1,410 · Food & NutritionNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $300 · Food & Nutrition
Other$165,200Human Services$18,503Religion$9,960Education$6,150Philanthropy$3,210Environment$2,700Food & Nutrition$2,210

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $15,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Research Institute Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER: $8,460 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDowning Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr: $2,910 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY SPIRIT RETIREMENT HOME INC: $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO FOURTEENERS INITIATIVE: $2,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $1,523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIANIC JEWISH BIBLE INSTITUTE INC: $1,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $1,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA3: $960 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOkoboji Protective Association: $650 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELAY ENTERPRISES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFES OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER: $495 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnbound: $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE LAB INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTERRACE HILL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFECARE HOSPICE: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF DES MOINES: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF IOWA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Christian Research Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds Downing Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr ↗
  • Who funds IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLY SPIRIT RETIREMENT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO FOURTEENERS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MESSIANIC JEWISH BIBLE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds A3 ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA15.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Servant Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Colorado Gives Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · United Way Worldwide · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fellowship Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fellowship Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Fellowship Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Fellowship Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fellowship’s filings →

More from the funding graph