· Public charity
The Family Leader Foundation Inc
To inspire the church to engage government for the advancement of god's kingdom and the strenthening of family
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $322,776 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $332,776 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $181k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRONTLINE POLICY COUNCIL | $80,699 |
| FAMILY FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA | $50,000 |
| INDIANA FAMILY INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY | $47,077 |
| WISCONSIN FAMILY COUNCIL | $25,000 |
| MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| FLORIDA FAMILY VOICE | $25,000 |
| KANSAS FAMILY VOICE | $10,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CIVIC LEAGUE OF ME | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $480k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFINDIANA FAMILY INSTITUTE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $926k · revenue +112% · 47% of their budget
- WFWisconsin Family Council7× · 2019–2025 · $518k · revenue +18%
- MFMINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE7× · 2019–2025 · $485k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- CDCAMBRIDGE DIGITAL BIBLE RESEARCHgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +558% · 35% of their budget
- PFPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY COUNCILone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0% · 62% of their budget
- TFTHE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF KENTUCKY INCone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Minnesota family council (mfc) is a non-profit christian organization that is dedicated to strengthening minnesota families by advancing biblical principles in the public arena, for the glory of the lord jesus christ and the good of…
Religious, charitable, educational and research efforts to advance judeo-christian values in our culture & government that support and strengthen the traditional family.
To stand for ky families and the biblical values that make them strong. work to educate and advocate for biblically sound public policy, including life, marriage & family, and religious freedom, that points people back to gods design for…
To protect and promote judeo-christian principles in california's culture for the benefit of its families. the organization provides educational material and participates in the political environment to promote traditional family values.
To educate people on what they can do to defend protect and promote traditional biblical values.
Research and education on family values
The purpose of the Organization is to advocate justice for families in the child welfare system.
Educates Wisconsin Citizens on issues that impact traditional families, Wisconsins most valuable natural resource. Wisconsin Family Action envisions a Wisconsin where God is honored, life is cherished, families thrive, and religious…
At Family Life Center International, it is our conviction that society can best be renewed and improved through strong moral families. Because we believe that there is a place in the modern, high-tech world for moral media, we are…
The mission of the Maryland Family Institute is to build a Maryland where God is honored, religious freedom flourishes, families thrive and life is cherished.
NCFR provides an educational forum for family researchers, educators and practitioners to share in the development and dissemination of knowledge about families and family relationships, establishes professional standards, and works to…
To identify, develop, and support policies and programs that will ensure the preservation and strengthening of traditional Judeo-Christian family values.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Christian Virtue and the most unlike its peers is Cambridge Digital Bible Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INDIANA FAMILY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Wisconsin Family Council ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE ↗
- Who funds TEXAS VALUES ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA FAMILY VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE POLICY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds The Family Foundation of Virginia ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CIVIC LEAGUE OF MAINE ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE DIGITAL BIBLE RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FAMILY VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds Delaware Strong Families Inc ↗
- Who funds Alaska Family Council ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Alliance Defending Freedom · Donors Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Family Leader Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Family Leader Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Family Leader Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.