· Private foundation
The Falic Family Private Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $218k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $949k
- $250k+1 grant · $475k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC | $475,000 |
| THIS WORLD - THE JEWISH VALUES NETWORK | $131,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $100,000 |
| ISRAEL'S FALLEN HEROES FUND | $100,000 |
| JEWISH CULTURE HIGH SCHOOL | $90,000 |
| WIZO | $84,100 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH | $75,000 |
| THE SHUL OF BAL HARBOUR | $69,280 |
| INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS | $50,000 |
| THE SHUL OF DOWN TOWN | $50,000 |
| COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS AMERICAN SECTION INC | $50,000 |
| ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY IS UNITY CORPORATION | $50,000 |
| HEALTHCORPS INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $184k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 82% of The Falic Family Private Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 54% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 18% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $461k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $950k · revenue +60%
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC2× · 2021–2023 · $311k · revenue +55%
- JCJewish Culture High School Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $240k · revenue +217%
Funded once
- VVARIOUSone grant, 2017 · $1.3M
- CJCamp Judaea Incone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -16%
- RARABBI ALEXANDER S GROSS HEBREW ACADEMYone grant, 2020 · $52k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To further jewish education in israel
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To foster jewish religious education and disseminate the teachings of rabbi nachman of breslov through publication and distribution of books and cds, as well as seminars, lectures and study groups.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Fyfl United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Culture High School Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY LEADER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH ↗
- Who funds Camp Judaea Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCORPS INC ↗
- Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Lanaar Elementary School Inc ↗
- Who funds OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KESHER LD INC KESHER ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds SIMCHA LAYELADIM INC ↗
- Who funds Worldwide Friends Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Chester Foundation · The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Setton Foundation · The Irving I Moskowitz Foundation · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Diana and Michael David Epstein Family Foundation Inc · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Hp Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Falic Family Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Helping Hands Food Ko Op Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Falic Family Private Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Falic Family Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.