How much does The Falic Family Private Foundation give?

The Falic Family Private Foundation reported 43 grants totaling $1,388,151 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 51 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.

What does The Falic Family Private Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (24%), Recreation & Sports (13%), Health (10%).

Who are The Falic Family Private Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: South Florida Sports Foundation Inc ($950k), Joe Dimaggio Children's Hospital Foundation Inc ($670k), Shul of Bal Harbour Inc ($453k).

Does The Falic Family Private Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 53% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Falic Family Private Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Falic Family Private Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc, Jewish Communal Fund, Jack Chester Foundation.

Where is The Falic Family Private Foundation based?

The Falic Family Private Foundation is based in FL.

The Falic Family Private Foundation

The Falic Family Private Foundation at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Falic Family Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$400k

Largest

01What it funds

0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.8MRecreation & Sports$966kHealth$711kArts & Culture$683kEducation$586kInternational$535kHuman Services$255kCivil Rights$140kOther$0

02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k23 grants · $86k
$10k–50k11 grants · $246k
$50k–250k8 grants · $656k
$250k+1 grant · $400k

$9,000

Median grant

States reached

$262k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION	$400,000
JEWISH CULTURE HIGH SCHOOL	$122,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH	$108,000
CHILDRENS TUMOR FOUNDATION	$100,000
ISRAELI AMERICAN COUNCIL CORP	$100,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH	$65,000
THE SHUL OF BAL HARBOUR	$61,160
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF SOUTH FLORIDA	$50,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS	$50,000
MICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY	$49,200
COMMUNITY IS UNITY CORPORATION	$35,000
SJL FOUNDATION	$30,000
COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS	$25,000
THE FAMILY LEADER FOUNDATION	$25,000
PRIZMAH CENTER FOR JEWISH EDUCATION	$18,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $338k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 82% of The Falic Family Private Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 54% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 18%.

The Falic Family Private Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$5.9M · 47 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.9M

$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+7%

Still filing today

57%

53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SF
SOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $950k · revenue +60%
FO
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
3× · 2021–2025 · $419k · revenue +55%
JC
Jewish Culture High School Inc
4× · 2022–2025 · $362k · revenue +217%

Funded once

V
VARIOUS
one grant, 2017 · $1.3M
MS
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
one grant, 2024 · $100k
CJ
Camp Judaea Incgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +49%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sherit Isroel

—

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah

—

American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation

Philanthropy

University of Judaism Foundation

—

Bais Yisrael Foundation

—

Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation

Philanthropy

Idf Memorial Foundation

Philanthropy

Yad Yosef Foundation

Philanthropy

Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida

—

American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Fyfl United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

87/88

Grantees still filing

52/88

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$4,648,517Health$1,144,759Youth Development$990,000Education$739,920International$508,205Arts & Culture$460,650Human Services$360,954

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Miami Jewish Federation IncFL47.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Chester Foundation · The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Setton Foundation · The Irving I Moskowitz Foundation · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Diana and Michael David Epstein Family Foundation Inc · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Hp Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Falic Family Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Falic Family Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

16get no government money at all

13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Falic Family Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Falic Family Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Falic Family Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home