Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fair Ways Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Environment$424kRecreation & Sports$293kAnimals$28kCommunity Improvement$25kFood & Nutrition$20kScience & Tech$16kEducation$11k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Audubon International$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,471
Meg Wah (My Earth)$15,525
Individual grant recipient$11,154
The Land At Home Project Inc$10,940
Stone Harbor Golf Club$10,000
FRIENDS of Great Salt Lake$7,000
Worksop Golf Club$6,250
Vicars Cross golf club Ltd$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,200
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 68% of grant dollars ($557k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 32% that went abroad ($260k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Land At Home Project Inc: $11k → 11%Ventana Canyon Golf & Racquet Club: $20k → 15%Swan Lake Country Club: $6k → 11%Concord Country Club: $14k → 6%Hill Crest Country Club: $25k → 10%Newport Bay Conservancy: $11k → 10%Martis Camp Community: $14k → 11%Audubon International: $25k → 11%Mohonk Preserve Inc: $18k → 16%AB Kristianstads Golfbana: $5k → 10%Friends of the Muni Inc: $25k → 12%Pawleys Plantation Golf & Country Club: $17k → 15%Parks Foundation of Broward County Inc: $16k → 13%Watershed Program of Southeast Wisconsin Inc: $10k → 10%Curry Watersheds Nonprofit: $24k → 14%Sherwood Forest Homeowners Association: $15k → 13%Button Hole Short Course and Teaching Center: $6k → 14%FRIENDS of Great Salt Lake: $7k → 8%University of Georgia Research Foundation: $16k → 27%City of Fort Collins - Southridge Golf Course: $11k → 11%Covington Elementary: $11k → 12%Elcona Country Club: $16k → 13%Rock Hollow Golf Course: $15k → 14%Sand Ridge Golf Club: $12k → 6%Ohio Bluebird Society: $25k → 9%McHenry County Conservation Foundation: $25k → 6%Mistwood Golf Club: $9k → 7%Evanston Wilmette Golf Course Association: $20k → 14%Rockford Park District Foundation: $11k → 15%Stone Harbor Golf Club: $10k → 10%Heritage Oaks Golf CourseCity of Harrisonburg: $4k → 11%Cactus & Pine Golf Course Superintendents Association: $25k → 11%Mohonk Preserve Inc: $15k → 16%Curry Watersheds Nonprofit: $23k → 14%FRIENDS of Great Salt Lake: $5k → 8%Cog Hill Golf and Country Club: $11k → 14%Curry Watersheds Nonprofit: $22k → 14%FRIENDS of Great Salt Lake: $5k → 8%Chicago District Golf Association Foundation: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
NC
SC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 32% of all-years giving ($260k)

8 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$183k · 14 grants
Belgium$19k · 1 grant
Canada$18k · 1 grant
Cameroon$16k · 1 grant
Finland$15k · 1 grant
Sweden$5k · 1 grant
Ireland$4k · 1 grant
Ghana$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$164k · 4 repeat orgs$653k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
39

Total granted

$164k
$541k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+32%

Still filing today

75%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CURRY WATERSHEDS NONPROFIT
    2× · 2021–2023 · $69k · revenue +5% · 28% of their budget
  • MP
    MOHONK PRESERVE INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $33k · revenue +6%
  • FO
    FRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake
    3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • CP
    CACTUS & PINE GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +69%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE MUNI INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +3% · 37% of their budget
  • HC
    HILL CREST COUNTRY CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Country Club

Operate and maintain public golf course in the detroit lakes area; provide recreation for all ages

Recreation & Sports
2
Wheatland Golf Club

Golf club

—
3
Forest Lake Country Club

Private golf and country club which provides dining, golf, and other social and recreational activities for its members.

Recreation & Sports
4
Kahgahgee Historical Golf Foundation

Preservation, restoration,and protection of the heritage of the oldest golf club west of mississippi river and historic structures thereon, and promoting amateur golf through programs and events, including youth golf camps and lessons for…

Recreation & Sports
5
Southern Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Dedicated to working with land owners to protect conservation-worthy land and natural resources of southern wisconsin.

Environment
6
Cypress Landing Golf Club

Operation of recreational golf facilities for members.

—
7
Montgomery Creek Preserve
Philanthropy
8
Lakeside Country Club

To promote social interaction and recreation for the benefit of its members.

—
9
Chicago Parks Foundation

The Chicago Parks Foundation is a separate 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization that also serves as the strategic partner for the coordination of fundraising and charitable resources for the Chicago Park District.

Recreation & Sports
10
Trustees of Roseland Park

To provide recreational opportunities to the public through the operation, maintenance and improvement of public facilities - including a par, golf course and driving range.

Recreation & Sports
11
Friends of Port Townsend Golf Park

To manage, maintain and enhance the Camas Prairie Golf Park

Recreation & Sports
12
Clarinda Country Club

Membership golf course

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evanston Wilmette Golf Course Association; the most unlike its peers is Land at Home Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Scottish Wildlife Trust: $45,145 · OtherScottish Wildlife TrustOHIO BLUEBIRD SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,471 · OtherEVANSTON WILMETTE GOLF COURSE ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · OtherVentana Canyon Golf & Racquet Club: $20,000 · OtherNairn Dunbar Golf Links: $20,000 · OtherThe Leicestershire Golf Club: $20,000 · OtherRoyal Bercuit Golf Club: $18,500 · OtherFox Meadow Golf Course: $18,000 · OtherWhitburn Golf Club Ltd: $17,000 · Other+29 more: $281,864 · Other+29 moreCURRY WATERSHEDS NONPROFIT: $68,936 · EnvironmentCURRY WATERSHEDS NONPROFITMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $32,500 · EnvironmentMOHONK PRESERVE INCTHE AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentTHE AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW…McHenry County Conservation Foundation: $25,000 · EnvironmentMcHenry County Conservatio…FRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $17,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS Of Great Salt LakeROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EnvironmentROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOU…WATERSHED PROGRAM OF SE WISCONSIN: $10,000 · EnvironmentHILL CREST COUNTRY CLUB: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsPARKS FOUNDATION OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $15,800 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE MUNI INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO DISTRICT GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $3,500 · PhilanthropyCACTUS & PINE GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $16,000 · EducationLand at Home Project Inc: $10,940 · Public Benefit
Other$505,980Environment$189,436Recreation & Sports$40,800Philanthropy$28,500Community Improvement$25,000Education$16,000Public Benefit$10,940

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCURRY WATERSHEDS NONPROFIT: $68,936 over 2y, 28% of budgetMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $32,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCACTUS & PINE GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MUNI INC: $25,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetTHE AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHILL CREST COUNTRY CLUB: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMcHenry County Conservation Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetEVANSTON WILMETTE GOLF COURSE ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $17,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElcona Country Club Inc: $15,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONCORD COUNTRY CLUB: $13,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWATERSHED PROGRAM OF SE WISCONSIN: $10,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCHICAGO DISTRICT GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CURRY WATERSHEDS NONPROFIT ↗
  • Who funds MOHONK PRESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CACTUS & PINE GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MUNI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW YORK STATE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILL CREST COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds McHenry County Conservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EVANSTON WILMETTE GOLF COURSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake ↗
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARKS FOUNDATION OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Elcona Country Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Land at Home Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATERSHED PROGRAM OF SE WISCONSIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fair Ways Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fair Ways Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Curry Watersheds Nonprofit: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fair Ways’ filings →

More from the funding graph