· Private foundation
The F2 Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $285k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $218k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION | $87,586 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND | $80,390 |
| TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATI | $50,000 |
| SANDRA DAY OCONNOR INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| FIRST PLACE AZ | $25,000 |
| SANDRA DAY OCONNOR INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF ALPHA GAMMA RHO | $25,000 |
| CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY ARIZONA | $25,000 |
| DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE | $25,000 |
| INTERMOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC | $20,000 |
| PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATI | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VHVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +370%
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY6× · 2017–2025 · $490k · revenue +196%
University of Illinois Foundation4× · 2022–2025 · $463k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- ASARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEWone grant, 2019 · $150k
- FOFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONAone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +8%
- MHMARICOPA HEALTH SYSTEM OUTREACH TRNG RESEARCH & PAone grant, 2017 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.
The university of arizona foundation is committed to supporting and enhancing the vision, mission and values of the university of arizona through the development and management of private support.
A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Search Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cancer Support Community Arizona ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE AZ ↗
- Who funds SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ↗
- Who funds Young Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF ALPHA GAMMA RHO ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds THE PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Intermountain Planned Parenthood ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds I WITNESS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center of Lake Ray Hubbard Area ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
- Who funds Guttmacher Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Thunderbirds Charities · Helios Education Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn · Garcia Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Lyon Dennis & Janis Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The F2 Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The F2 Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The F2 Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.