· Private foundation
The Evergreen Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k37 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $204k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON | $97,214 |
| THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI) | $53,419 |
| THE WASHINGTON INSTITE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY | $53,000 |
| STAND WITH US | $15,544 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,204 |
| ISRAEL POLICY FORUM | $10,000 |
| THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO ADVANCE ADOLESCENT HEALTH | $10,000 |
| SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,840 |
| ADL | $5,210 |
| US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $5,145 |
| A SAFE PLACE INC | $4,000 |
| THE ANNE FRANK HOUSE | $3,608 |
| CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK | $2,575 |
| ARCADIA UNIVERSITY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 51% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WIWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY8× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +51%
- TNTHE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO ADVANCE ADOLESCENT HEALTH8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +15%
- IPISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +157%
Funded once
- HFHospital for Special Surgeryone grant, 2023 · $25k
- JIJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR LIBERAL VALUES INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +79%
- GIGATHER INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nantucket Dance Theater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO ADVANCE ADOLESCENT HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE HERON THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE LAWFARE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds ANNE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds ARCADIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR LIBERAL VALUES INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds GATHER INC ↗
- Who funds A SAFE PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CREATIVE CHANGE ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morningstar Philanthropic Foundation D/B/A the Morningstar Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Dweck Philanthropies Inc · The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Rhea S Schwartz & Paul Martin Wolff Foundation · The Carl & Nancy Gewirz Fund Inc · Howard and Geraldine Polinger Family Foundation · The Gary & Carol Berman Family Foundation Inc · The Dorothy G Bender Foundation Inc · The Hartman Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Evergreen Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- A Safe Place Inc — 45% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Austen Riggs Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.