Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$144kEducation$75kHealth$50kReligion$35kYouth Development$34kHuman Services$30kEnvironment$29kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$5,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHENANGO VALLEY HOME$35,000
CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH$10,000
BROAD ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$8,400
Individual grant recipient$5,870
AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC$5,300
FRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL$5,000
COLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL INC$3,250
PATHFINDER VILLAGE$2,500
BAINBRIDGE-GUILFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL$2,000
NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $10k → 12%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $10k → 12%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $9k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $5k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $5k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $5k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $3k → 12%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$397k · 17 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$397k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+72%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $144k · revenue +38%
  • TC
    THE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +5%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF OLD LYME
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • HP
    HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF CHENANGO CO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chenango Greenway Conservancy Inc

Conserve and enhance public access to trails and green space in chenango county

Environment
2
Chenango Nursery School Inc

To provide childcare services for approximately 140 children in the hamilton, ny area.

—
3
United Way of Mid Rural New York Inc

Chenango united way builds partnerships and maximizes resources to improve the quality of life for local residents in the focus areas of income, education and health.

Philanthropy
4
Chenango Housing Improvement Prgm Inc

The organization's mission is to create, provide, and maintain housing for elderly and low income families.

—
5
Commerce Chenango Inc

To serve our members and the people of chenango county through partnership with businesses and all levels of government,to leverage resources for sustainable economic growth.

—
6
Chenango River Theatre Inc

The creation of exceptionally high quality, affordable, professional, non-profit theatre to engage and educate a diverse audience, both traditional and non-traditional.

Arts & Culture
7
Chenango County Habitat for Humanity

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building and renovating houses so that there are decent houses in decent communities in…

—
8
Venango County Historical Society

To promote the study of the history of venango county and its general area and to develop an interest in the study of venango county and its citizens.

Arts & Culture
9
Chenango Valley Nursery Inc

Provide Nursery School services.

Education
10
Chase Memorial Nursing Home Co Inc

Chase memorial nursing home strives to be the provider and employer of choice in long term care with an emphasis on providing the highest quality care for our residents in a safe, clean and stimulating environment.

Health
11
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
Chenla Children's Health Inc

Chenla children's healthcare provides lifesaving pediatric and neonatal care, strengthens health systems, and trains local health workers in eastern cambodia in partnership with the ministry of health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chenango County Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is The Chenango Valley Home Inc Dba the Chenango Valley Apartments. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS: $143,700 · OtherTHE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTSIndividual grant recipient: $52,370 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED CHURCH CHRIST 1ST CONG: $21,200 · OtherUNITED CHURCH CHRIST 1ST CONGALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $11,500 · Other+14 more: $81,700 · Other+14 moreFRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER: $28,800 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF ROG…COLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL: $17,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORSCAPE CHE…CHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHENANGO COUNT…CHENANGO COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC: $31,357 · Human ServicesTHE CHRISTIA…AUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC: $17,800 · Human ServicesAUNT MARY'S …CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $17,200 · HealthWreaths Across America: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$310,470Arts & Culture$53,300Human Services$49,157Health$17,200Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS: $143,700 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC: $31,357 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER: $28,800 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetAUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC: $17,800 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetCHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $17,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL: $17,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHENANGO COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWreaths Across America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDER VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHENANGO COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roger W Follett Foundation Inc Co Lee Emerson and Palmer LLPNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roger W Follett Foundation Inc Co Lee Emerson and Palmer LLP · The Phyllis a and Daryl R Forsythe Foundation · The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito Foundation · Thomas &Esther Flanagan Charitable Trust · Otis a Thompson Foundation Inc · The Greater Norwich Foundation · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · The Patricia M & H William Smith Jr Foundation · The R C Smith Foundation Inc · Raymond Foundation · The Richard L & Marian P Cook Foundation · Preferred Mutual Insurance Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Everett & Pearl Gilmour’s filings →

    More from the funding graph