Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Housing & Shelter$144kEducation$75kHealth$50kReligion$35kYouth Development$34kHuman Services$30kEnvironment$29kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$5,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHENANGO VALLEY HOME$35,000
CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH$10,000
BROAD ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$8,400
Individual grant recipient$5,870
AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC$5,300
FRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL$5,000
COLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL INC$3,250
PATHFINDER VILLAGE$2,500
BAINBRIDGE-GUILFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL$2,000
NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $10k → 12%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $10k → 12%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $9k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $5k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $5k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $5k → 12%AUNT MARYS HOUSE INC: $3k → 12%CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$397k · 17 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$397k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+72%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $144k · revenue +38%
  • TC
    THE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +5%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF OLD LYME
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • HP
    HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF CHENANGO CO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chenango Greenway Conservancy Inc

Conserve and enhance public access to trails and green space in chenango county

Environment
2
Chenango Nursery School Inc

To provide childcare services for approximately 140 children in the hamilton, ny area.

3
United Way of Mid Rural New York Inc

Chenango united way builds partnerships and maximizes resources to improve the quality of life for local residents in the focus areas of income, education and health.

Philanthropy
4
Chenango Housing Improvement Prgm Inc

The organization's mission is to create, provide, and maintain housing for elderly and low income families.

5
Commerce Chenango Inc

To serve our members and the people of chenango county through partnership with businesses and all levels of government,to leverage resources for sustainable economic growth.

6
Chenango River Theatre Inc

The creation of exceptionally high quality, affordable, professional, non-profit theatre to engage and educate a diverse audience, both traditional and non-traditional.

Arts & Culture
7
Chenango County Habitat for Humanity

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building and renovating houses so that there are decent houses in decent communities in…

8
Venango County Historical Society

To promote the study of the history of venango county and its general area and to develop an interest in the study of venango county and its citizens.

Arts & Culture
9
Chenango Valley Nursery Inc

Provide Nursery School services.

Education
10
Chase Memorial Nursing Home Co Inc

Chase memorial nursing home strives to be the provider and employer of choice in long term care with an emphasis on providing the highest quality care for our residents in a safe, clean and stimulating environment.

Health
11
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

12
Chenla Children's Health Inc

Chenla children's healthcare provides lifesaving pediatric and neonatal care, strengthens health systems, and trains local health workers in eastern cambodia in partnership with the ministry of health.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chenango County Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is The Chenango Valley Home Inc Dba the Chenango Valley Apartments. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS — $143,700 · OtherTHE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTSIndividual grant recipient — $52,370 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED CHURCH CHRIST 1ST CONG — $21,200 · OtherUNITED CHURCH CHRIST 1ST CONGALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $11,500 · Other+14 more — $81,700 · Other+14 moreFRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER — $28,800 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF ROG…COLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL — $17,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORSCAPE CHE…CHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHENANGO COUNT…CHENANGO COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS — $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC — $31,357 · Human ServicesTHE CHRISTIA…AUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC — $17,800 · Human ServicesAUNT MARY'S …CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC — $17,200 · HealthWreaths Across America — $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$310,470Arts & Culture$53,300Human Services$49,157Health$17,200Public Benefit$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS — $143,700 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC — $31,357 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER — $28,800 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetAUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC — $17,800 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetCHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC — $17,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL — $17,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHENANGO COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS — $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWreaths Across America — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHENANGO VALLEY HOME INC DBA THE CHENANGO VALLEY APARTMENTS
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF NORWICH INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ROGERS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER
  • Who funds AUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC
  • Who funds CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds COLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL
  • Who funds CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CHENANGO COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS
  • Who funds PATHFINDER VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roger W Follett Foundation Inc Co Lee Emerson and Palmer LLPNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roger W Follett Foundation Inc Co Lee Emerson and Palmer LLP · The Phyllis a and Daryl R Forsythe Foundation · The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito Foundation · Thomas &Esther Flanagan Charitable Trust · Otis a Thompson Foundation Inc · The Greater Norwich Foundation · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · The Patricia M & H William Smith Jr Foundation · The R C Smith Foundation Inc · Raymond Foundation · The Richard L & Marian P Cook Foundation · Preferred Mutual Insurance Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph