Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Evans Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$563k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.2MRecreation & Sports$951kHuman Services$705kEducation$670kYouth Development$495kPhilanthropy$283kEmployment$230kCrime & Legal$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$200,000
Individual grant recipient$63,455
GOODKIDS MADCITY ENGLEWOOD$50,000
FOSTER PROGRESS$50,000
HEALING TO ACTION$50,000
GYRLS IN THE HOOD FOUNDATION$50,000
EDOVO FOUNDATION$50,000
PROJECT ONETEN$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%The Dreamcatcher Foundation: $125k → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $125k → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $125k → 14%The Dreamcatcher Foundation: $120k → 14%The Dreamcatcher Foundation: $60k → 14%FOSTER PROGRESS: $80k → 14%FOSTER PROGRESS: $50k → 14%FOSTER PROGRESS: $50k → 14%FOSTER PROGRESS: $50k → 14%Foster Progress: $50k → 14%FOSTER PROGRESS: $50k → 14%FOSTER PROGRESS: $50k → 14%Foster Progress: $50k → 14%Foster Progress: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 12 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$4.5M
$15k

Still filing today

92%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +207%
  • Northwestern University
    8× · 2017–2025 · $951k · revenue +41%
  • FP
    Foster Progress
    9× · 2017–2025 · $440k · revenue ×15 · 95% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • UL
    UNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
2
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
3
The Partnership for College Completion

The Partnership for College Completion (PCC) champions policies, practices, and systems that increase college completion and eliminate degree completion disparities for low-income, first generation, and students of color in Illinois…

Education
4
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
5
Emerge Fellowship

Fellows persist through graduation and into careers that build long-term economic mobility for themselves & their communities.

Education
6
Represented Leadership Inc

Our mission is to build career pathways for early-stage professionals who are harnessing the power of their leadership through internships professional roles and entrepreneurial opportunities to access a stable well-paid and values-aligned…

Education
7
Public Interest Law Initiative

PILI engages, inspires and empowers those advancing equal access to justice.

Crime & Legal
8
Immigrants Rising

We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.

Human Services
9
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
10
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
11
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
12
Black Researchers Collective

The mission of the Black Researchers Collective is to advance racial equity by training and equipping communities with research tools to be more civically engaged and policy informed.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Urban Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project OneTen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $1,201,600 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INCIndividual grant recipient: $283,455 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more: $45,000 · OtherDreamcatcher Foundation Inc: $705,000 · Human ServicesDreamcatcher Foundation IncFoster Progress: $440,000 · Human ServicesFoster ProgressNorthwestern University: $951,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern Universit…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $200,000 · EducationMassachus…LINK Unlimited Scholars: $120,000 · EducationLINK Unli…Gyrls In The HOOD Foundation: $100,000 · EducationGyrls In …ONEGOAL: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentProject OneTen: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentHealing to Action: $230,000 · EmploymentEDOVO FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Crime & LegalGood Kids Mad City - Englewood: $50,000 · Crime & LegalRepro TLC: $45,000 · Health
Other$1,530,055Human Services$1,145,000Recreation & Sports$951,000Education$420,000Youth Development$300,000Employment$230,000Crime & Legal$150,000Health$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $1,201,600 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $951,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDreamcatcher Foundation Inc: $705,000 over 6y, 57% of budgetFoster Progress: $440,000 over 9y, 95% of budgetONEGOAL: $250,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHealing to Action: $230,000 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLINK Unlimited Scholars: $120,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetEDOVO FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGyrls In The HOOD Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetRepro TLC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCollective Initiatives Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Dreamcatcher Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Foster Progress ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds Healing to Action ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds LINK Unlimited Scholars ↗
  • Who funds EDOVO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Gyrls In The HOOD Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Project OneTen ↗
  • Who funds Good Kids Mad City - Englewood ↗
  • Who funds Repro TLC ↗
  • Who funds Collective Initiatives Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL17.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Chicago Foundation for Women · Robert R McCormick Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Evans Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Evans Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evans Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph