Skip to content
The Eva Longoria Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Eva Longoria Foundation

Eva longoria foundation's mission is to empower latinas to reach their full potential through education and entrepreneurship.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$2.4MCommunity Improvement$1.7MPhilanthropy$400kEmployment$350kArts & Culture$301kEducation$297kInternational$250kFood & Nutrition$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.3M
$250,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$451k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LATINO PROSPERITY$250,000
RIDEBACK RISE$250,000
CASA DE ANGELES$250,000
EVAS HEROES$250,000
MLT (MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW)$250,000
HEAD COUNT INC$100,000
LEAN IN LATINAS$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $445k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CASA DE ANGELES: $250k → 8%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150k → 10%ADELANTE MUJERES: $22k → 8%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
CA
MD
AZ
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of The Eva Longoria Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 60% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 35%.

The Eva Longoria Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 46% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 11 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$3.5M
$959k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+65%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ACCESSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +34%
  • DG
    DIY GIRLS
    3× · 2020–2023 · $223k · revenue +17%
  • FA
    Fresno Area Hispanic Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $190k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • TA
    The Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Clubgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $425k · revenue +107%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2017 · $157k · revenue -13%
  • TC
    THE CLUBHOUSE NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latino Leadership Institute

By 2050, Latinos will comprise nearly 30 of the US population. Today and in the future, the demographic destiny of the U.S will be characterized by the growing Latino population. In fact, Latinos have an impact in all aspects of life. We…

Arts & Culture
2
Latino Business Chamber of Greater La Foundation Inc

To facilitate economic structures and policy initiatives that empower Latino business development and foster economic growth across Los Angeles.

Human Services
3
Hispanic Access Foundation

Hispanic access foundation connects latinos and others to partners and opportunities to improve lives and create an equitable society.

Human Services
4
Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley

Our Mission is to develop and strengthen the power of Latinas to advance our collective success through sisterhood, leadership, and civic engagement.

Public Benefit
5
Latino Media Collaborative

Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…

Arts & Culture
6
Community Development Technologies Center

To build livable and economically viable communities in the low income areas of This is accomplished by Greater Los Angeles strengthening the skils and self-sufficiency of residents, businesses of residents, businesses and community…

Community Improvement
7
Latino Business Chamber of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Economic development of the latino community

Community Improvement
8
Multicultural Women Executive Leadership Foundation

The Multicultural Women Executive Leadership Foundation is a non-profit organization that offers leadership and entrepreneurship training and development for multicultural women and men. Its focus is on strengthening the US economic…

Education
9
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
10
Latinas Usa
Community Improvement
11
Latino Corporate Directors Association

Lcda serves as an advocate and resource to corporate boards, search firms, private equity, and institutional investors interested in gaining access to exceptional latino board talent.

Education
12
Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science

Sacnas is an inclusive organization dedicated to fostering the success of chicanos/hispanics and native americans, from college students to professionals, in attaining advanced degrees, careers, and positions of leadership in stem.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Casa de Angeles Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
16/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENRY FORD LEARNING INSTITUTE: $1,305,000 · EducationHENRY FORD LEARNING INSTITUTEMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW: $250,000 · EducationMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMOR…LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $71,000 · Education+2 more: $47,000 · EducationACCESSITY: $1,076,666 · Community ImprovementACCESSITYFresno Area Hispanic Foundation: $190,000 · Community ImprovementFresno Area Hispanic Found…INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $130,000 · Community ImprovementINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE C…The Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Club: $425,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Antelope Valley…DIY GIRLS: $222,570 · Youth DevelopmentDIY GIRLSBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $156,750 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB O…HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIESTHE CLUBHOUSE NETWORK INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CLUBHOUSE NETWO…+1 more: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentLATINO PROSPERITY: $250,000 · PhilanthropyLATINO PR…EVA'S HEROES: $250,000 · PhilanthropyEVA'S HER…LOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCasa de Angeles Foundation: $250,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $23,152 · Human ServicesADELANTE MUJERES: $22,000 · Human ServicesRIDEBACK RISE INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureSTEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK: $101,772 · Arts & CultureA PLACE CALLED HOME: $100,000 · OtherA PLACE CAL…PARENT INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC: $75,000 · OtherPARENT INST…PAJARO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL: $28,500 · OtherLEAN IN LATINAS: $100,000 · OtherLEAN IN LAT…Prospera Community Development: $75,000 · OtherProspera Co…HEAD COUNT INC: $100,000 · OtherHEAD COUNT …SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $77,500 · OtherSOCIAL AND …AI AND YOU ORG: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · Other
Education$1,673,000Community Improvement$1,396,666Youth Development$1,051,320Philanthropy$525,000Human Services$445,152Arts & Culture$351,772Other$591,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY FORD LEARNING INSTITUTE: $1,305,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetACCESSITY: $1,076,666 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetThe Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Club: $425,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetLATINO PROSPERITY: $250,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRIDEBACK RISE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetEVA'S HEROES: $250,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCasa de Angeles Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetDIY GIRLS: $222,570 over 3y, 17% of budgetFresno Area Hispanic Foundation: $190,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $156,750 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $130,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK: $101,772 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLEAN IN LATINAS: $100,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetHEAD COUNT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CLUBHOUSE NETWORK INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $77,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetProspera Community Development: $75,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPARENT INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $71,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCenter for Innovations in Education: $37,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAI AND YOU ORG: $25,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $23,152 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES: $22,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $22,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Latino Community Foun…The California Wellne…The Annenberg Foundat…Wells Fargo FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Liberty Hill Foundati…Weingart FoundationThe James Irvine Foun…Silicon Valley Commun…The California Endowm…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
California Community FoundationCA17.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Latino Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eva Longoria Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eva Longoria Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • The Clubhouse Network Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Eva Longoria Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Eva Longoria Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eva Longoria’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home