Skip to content
The Eva and Milton J Braslow Foundation Co Red Pine Reliance Co LLC at a glance

· Private foundation

The Eva and Milton J Braslow Foundation Co Red Pine Reliance Co LLC

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$850
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Religion$14kEducation$6kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$3kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$360
Median grant
2
States reached
$109k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVENDELL SCHOOL$850
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNT$850
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF WESTPORT$750
ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION$750
THE RCC FOUNDATION$750
JEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS$720
BINGHAMTON PHILHARMONIC$360
CHABAD OF BINGHAMTON$360
ROMEMU$360
TRI-CITIES OPERA$360
BETH DAVID SYNAGOGUE$360
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$360
HILLEL ACADEMY OF BROOME COUNTY$360
Individual grant recipient$360
TCS$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS: $750 → 7%ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION: $750 → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNT: $850 → 14%ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION: $750 → 17%CHABAD OF BINGHAMTON: $500 → 20%RIVENDELL SCHOOL: $850 → 20%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF WESTPORT: $750 → 9%RCC FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%RIVENDELL SCHOOL: $750 → 7%JEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS: $720 → 7%ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNT: $750 → 14%ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%HILLEL ACADEMY OF BROOME COUNTY: $500 → 20%RIVENDELL SCHOOL: $750 → 20%TCS: $540 → 9%RCC FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%RIVENDELL SCHOOL: $650 → 7%JEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS: $500 → 7%ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNT: $750 → 14%ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%CHABAD OF BINGHAMTON: $500 → 20%RIVENDELL SCHOOL: $750 → 20%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF WESTPORT: $540 → 9%RCC FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%RIVENDELL SCHOOL: $500 → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNT: $750 → 14%ICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM: $500 → 17%BINGHAMTON JCC: $500 → 20%KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE: $648 → 20%HAYGROUND SCHOOL: $750 → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNT: $750 → 14%BINGHAMTON JCC: $500 → 20%KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE: $500 → 20%HAYGROUND SCHOOL: $750 → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNT: $700 → 14%MESSIAH OUTREACH: $600 → 7%THE RCC FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%BROTHERHOOD SYNAGOGUE: $750 → 17%THE RCC FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%THE RCC FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%BROTHERHOOD SYNAGOGUE: $750 → 17%BROTHERHOOD SYNAGOGUE: $750 → 17%BROTHERHOOD SYNAGOGUE: $700 → 17%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 20%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 20%BETH DAVID SYNAGOGUE: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 19 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$41k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+38%

Still filing today

42%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +6%
  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +111%
  • TO
    TRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • MO
    Messiahs Outreach Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $600 · revenue +5%
  • IH
    ICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ridgefield Community Kindergarten Inc

To provide preschool education for children ages 2-5.

—
2
The Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra Inc

To enrich the cultural life of our public by providing professional live orchestra concerts and conducting related educational programs.

Arts & Culture
3
Rochester Christian School Inc

Partnering with parents to develop a child's head, heart and hands for Jesus Christ through God's Word and academic excellence.

Education
4
Ruach Chaim Inc

Educational and charitable

Religion
5
Rockland Country Day School

The organization is a private school covering grades pre-k to 12th. the principal aim of the school is to provide an academic curriculum and intellectual environment suitable for young people preparing for advanced education.

—
6
Richmond Hebrew Day School

The richmond hebrew day school (dba rudlin torah academy) is a private nonprofit institution that provides instruction for children from kindergarten through eighth grade throughout the greater richmond, vametropolitan area.

Education
7
Rockland Conservatory of Music

Music school

Arts & Culture
8
Rutgers Learning Network Inc

Conduct of Judaic studies programs and religious events

Arts & Culture
9
Rockland Jewish Community Center Corp

Agencies for purpose of encouraging those of jewish faith and others to participate in and support causes involving or affecting jews in rockland county.

Human Services
10
Beit Rabban Day School

Beit rabban's mission is to nurture our children to be critical and creative thinkers, responsible world citizens, deeply fluent in jewish texts, hebrew language, the humanities and the sciences, respectful of a multiplicity of views, and…

Education
11
The Ideal School of Manhattan

An independent school providing a comprehensive educational program for children from K through 12th grade.

Education
12
Ridgefield Academy Inc

The ridgefield academy and landmark preschool community celebrates childhood, pursues excellence and cultivates kindness. our educational program is intellectually inspiring and we foster joyful learning and mutual respect in all that we…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Rockland County; the most unlike its peers is Rcc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROTHERHOOD SYNAGOGUE: $2,950 · OtherBROTHERHOOD SYNAGOGUEBETH DAVID SYNAGOGUE: $2,580 · OtherBETH DAVID SYNAGOGUEIndividual grant recipient: $2,440 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD OF BINGHAMTON: $2,440 · OtherCHABAD OF BINGHAMTONJEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS: $2,330 · OtherJEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONSTHE RCC FOUNDATION: $2,250 · OtherTHE RCC FOUNDATIONHILLEL ACADEMY OF BROOME COUNTY: $2,240 · OtherHILLEL ACADEMY OF BROOME COUNTYKEHILAT ROMEMU: $1,800 · OtherKEHILAT ROMEMUIndividual grant recipient: $1,508 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF WESTPORT: $1,290 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF WESTPORTTCS: $900 · Other+2 more: $1,100 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $2,440 · EducationFOUNDATION OF THE S…RIVENDELL SCHOOL: $2,350 · EducationRIVENDELL SCHOOLRIVENDELL SCHOOL: $1,900 · EducationRIVENDELL SCHOOLHAYGROUND SCHOOL INC: $1,500 · EducationHAYGROUND SCHOOL IN…JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $4,550 · Community ImprovementJEWISH FEDE…TRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC: $2,380 · Arts & CultureTRI-CITIES…Binghamton Philharmonic Inc: $1,980 · Arts & CultureBinghamton…ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Recreation & SportsRCC FOUNDATION: $2,250 · Philanthropy
Other$23,828Education$8,190Community Improvement$4,550Arts & Culture$4,360Recreation & Sports$3,500Philanthropy$2,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $4,550 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $2,440 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC: $2,380 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIVENDELL SCHOOL: $2,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRCC FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetBinghamton Philharmonic Inc: $1,980 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIVENDELL SCHOOL: $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAYGROUND SCHOOL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMessiahs Outreach Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCKLAND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-CITIES OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVENDELL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RCC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Binghamton Philharmonic Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIVENDELL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HAYGROUND SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Messiahs Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds ICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundThe Victor& Esther Ro…The Community Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for Good
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Victor& Esther Rozen Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eva and Milton J Braslow Foundation Co Red Pine Reliance Co LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eva and Milton J Braslow Foundation Co Red Pine Reliance Co LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eva and Milton J Braslow Foundation Co Red Pine Reliance Co LLC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home