Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eugene Garfield Foundation 0706-03-45

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$392k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$500kEducation$395kCivil Rights$160kArts & Culture$138kInternational$80kFood & Nutrition$45kHealth$41kScience & Tech$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $195k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HOME$145,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$50,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$35,000
SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE$30,000
OPERA PHILADELPHIA$25,000
BETA PHI MU HONOR SOCIETY$18,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$15,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$10,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$10,000
HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$10,000
MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER$10,000
PHILABUNDANCE$10,000
OPTIONS IN AGING$5,000
MITZVAH CIRCLE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $424k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MITZVAH CIRCLE: $5k → 7%OPTIONS IN AGING: $5k → 9%PROJECT HOME: $145k → 22%OPTIONS IN AGING: $4k → 9%PROJECT HOME: $100k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $100k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $55k → 22%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$958k · 17 repeat orgs$317k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$958k
$302k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+7%

Still filing today

71%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    4× · 2021–2025 · $400k · revenue +5%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +27%
  • OPERA PHILADELPHIA
    4× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVER
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • AF
    ACLU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
4
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
5
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
11
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
12
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Science History Institute; the most unlike its peers is Strawberry Mansion Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETA PHI MU HONOR SOCIETY: $105,000 · OtherBETA PHI MU HONOR SOCIETYPROJECT HOME: $100,000 · OtherPROJECT HOMETHE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVER: $50,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERACLU FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATIONHIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION: $30,000 · OtherHIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATIONOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $25,000 · OtherMIT: $20,000 · OtherPhilabundance: $30,000 · OtherPhilabundanceMONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER: $21,000 · Other+9 more: $61,000 · Other+9 morePROJECT HOME: $400,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME+3 more: $23,500 · Human Services+3 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $200,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE U…STRAWBERRY MANSION LEARNING CENTER: $30,000 · EducationSTRAWBERRY MANSIO…+1 more: $1,500 · EducationOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $100,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · Civil RightsInternational Rescue Committee INC: $35,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $35,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · InternationalSCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE: $40,377 · Science & Tech
Other$477,000Human Services$423,500Education$231,500Arts & Culture$107,500Civil Rights$105,000International$90,000Science & Tech$40,377

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT HOME: $400,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE: $40,377 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAWBERRY MANSION LEARNING CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetMONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER: $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPTIONS IN AGING: $8,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAYSON SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds STRAWBERRY MANSION LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS IN AGING ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAYSON SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eugene Garfield Foundation 0706-03-45 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eugene Garfield Foundation 0706-03-45. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eugene Garfield Foundation 0706-03-45’s filings →

    More from the funding graph