Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

OPTIONS IN AGING

OPTIONS IN AGING (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $382,908 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($130,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$255k
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$383k
Net assets
$289k
5/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%
01What it does

What Options in Aging does

Mission

The mission of new horizons is to provide supportive programs and services enabling adults to live independently in their own homes, form meaningful connections with others and engage in lifelong learning.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. New horizon senior center has provided stimulating, nurturing and progressive programming for active adults in and around lower merion township for over forty years. We currently serve over 1,000 unduplicated seniors. Nhscs rich and varied programs fit into four broad categories (recreation & socialization, education, health & wellness, and supportive services) and are carefully designed to foster all aspects of wellness for seniors. Nhsc has a unique and successful volunteer-led program model which helps many of our own seniors to find meaning and purpose in retirement. They greatly enhance our capacity to serve! During this fiscal year, nhsc provided safe, grab and go nutritious lunches for senior citizens (age 60+) free of charge or by a pay if they can anonymous donation. During the on-going pandemic, we have offered a robust array of our programs remotely. We continue this safe modality as part of our service delivery. We provide a full array of remote programs and services -from computer tech support, aging support groups and private counseling, to book, discussion, and exercise groups. Staff and volunteers quickly re-deployed to maximize our capacity to provide remote…

    $264,740 spent$680 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2023 Form 990. Program spending in total: $264,740.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($245k) Expenses 100 ($202k) Net assets 100 ($95k)2018 Revenue 105 ($258k) Expenses 105 ($213k) Net assets 147 ($140k)2019 Revenue 101 ($247k) Expenses 125 ($251k) Net assets 143 ($136k)2020 Revenue 84 ($205k) Expenses 89 ($180k) Net assets 169 ($161k)2021 Revenue 102 ($250k) Expenses 84 ($169k) Net assets 254 ($242k)2022 Revenue 115 ($282k) Expenses 102 ($206k) Net assets 334 ($318k)2023 Revenue 107 ($262k) Expenses 121 ($243k) Net assets 354 ($337k)2024 Revenue 104 ($255k) Expenses 150 ($302k) Net assets 304 ($289k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (104)Expenses (150)Net assets (304)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $249k to $328k (+32%).

$105k
$152k
$153k
$169k
$249k
$328k
$344k
$296k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 55% · 2018 50% · 2019 55% · 2020 34% · 2021 36% · 2022 35% · 2023 35% · 2024 30%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of OPTIONS IN AGING’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$43k
’17
$45k
’18
−$5k
’19
$25k
’20
$81k
’21
$76k
’22
$19k
’23
−$48k
’24
8.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Richard Stein

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed10121077778
Joined·+2+0+1+0+0+0+1
No longer listed·0240000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $11k → $38k.

3 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 39% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OPTIONS IN AGING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OPTIONS IN AGING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

39% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund OPTIONS IN AGING.

34%
largest funder
78%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 57% · 2019 42% · 2020 59% · 2021 50% · 2022 100% · 2023 73% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of OPTIONS IN AGING's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 42% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

100% of OPTIONS IN AGING's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $150k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

OPTIONS IN AGING is better cushioned than half of the 21,616 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−19% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve8.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,616 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like OPTIONS IN AGING

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 6%Fundraising 7%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

72%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OPTIONS IN AGING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OPTIONS IN AGING?
OPTIONS IN AGING (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $382,908 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($130,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does OPTIONS IN AGING have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $382,908 in grants to OPTIONS IN AGING, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OPTIONS IN AGING?
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $130,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OPTIONS IN AGING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Options in Aging →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing