· Private foundation
The Eucharist Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $94k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRAND SHERAMINA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $25,000 |
| CAMP RECREATION | $20,000 |
| ASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY | $15,000 |
| WORLD VILLAGES FOR CHILDREN | $12,000 |
| SAINT PAUL VI INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF HUMAN REP | $12,000 |
| NOURISHING HOPE | $10,000 |
| THOMAS MORE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| JERUSALEM FARM | $5,000 |
| CHICAGO HEIGHTENING OPPORTUNITY AND POTENTIAL FOR | $5,000 |
| ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED | $5,000 |
| BECKET FUND | $3,000 |
| DOMINICAN SMME CORPORATION | $3,000 |
| NASAREANORG INC | $3,000 |
| CATHOLIC ANSWERS INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AYASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY7× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +358%
- CICHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +148%
- JFJerusalem Farm9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +487%
Funded once
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +38%
- SMST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +31%
- LLLIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
As the charitable arm of the archdiocese of denver and inspired by god's love and compassion, catholic charities extends the healing ministry of jesus christ to the poor and those in need. catholic charities of the archdiocese of denver…
To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…
St. Mary's Center for Women and Children (SMC), a multi-service organization supporting women, children, and families, believes shelter is not enough to erase the devastation of cyclical poverty and homelessness.Grounded in social justice,…
Based on our commitment to catholic social teaching, catholic social services of montana provides for works of advocacy, compassion, pastoral outreach, education and social justice.
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
The mission of the california catholic conference, inc. (ccc) is to advocate with the legislative, administrative, and judicial branches of state government for the catholic church's public policy agenda and to facilitate common pastoral…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Tyler's Tribe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds GRAND SHERAMINA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Saint Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jerusalem Farm ↗
- Who funds BANDING TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BISHOP GALLEGOS MATERNITY HOME ↗
- Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR PRISONERS INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT MY CLUB ↗
- Who funds The Becket Fund ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MY CATHOLIC DOCTOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds C-FAM INC ↗
- Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF HILLSBORO ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
- Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER PREVENTION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Unbound ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC ANSWERS INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · Cousineau Family Charity · Rafael Madan & Lilian Casas Foundation · The Moran Foundation · Pema Foundation Inc · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Eucharist Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Eucharist Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Eucharist Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.