Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Esther Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$878kEducation$719kHuman Services$298kRecreation & Sports$100kInternational$75kReligion$63kPhilanthropy$49kEnvironment$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS$110,000
ATHLETES IN ACTION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
INTERVARSITY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LOS ANGELES OPERA$7,500
HOPE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES$5,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$2,500
CHERRY HILLS COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,500
POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $15k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
CO
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 16 repeat orgs$378k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against -45% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
22

Total granted

$2.0M
$371k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
-45%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $523k · revenue +100%
  • WP
    WILD PHILANTHROPY INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $75k · revenue +240% · 26% of their budget
  • SL
    Scholar Leaders International
    3× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +388%

Funded once

  • JH
    JEREMIAH'S HOPE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -56% · 60% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • MS
    Michael S Heiser Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
2
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
3
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
4
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
5
Fresno Pacific University

The university is the central valley's only accredited christian university, offering leading academic programs and ethical and spiritual development through traditional bachelor's degree, adult degree completion, master's, certificate,…

—
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
8
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
9
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
10
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
11
Association for Biblical Higher Education

Abhe is the quality and credibility resource partner that connects efforts among christian postsecondary educational institutions and with others invested in serious bible learning that shapes a life of godly influence and service to the…

Education
12
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholar Leaders International; the most unlike its peers is Upper Colorado River Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $726,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $150,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCATHLETES IN ACTION: $100,000 · OtherATHLETES IN ACTION+23 more: $242,150 · Other+23 moreALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $523,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATIONAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $130,000 · EducationAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITYScholar Leaders International: $45,000 · EducationScholar Leaders International+3 more: $10,550 · EducationJEREMIAH'S HOPE INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesJEREMIAH'S H…FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESEA…WILD PHILANTHROPY INC: $75,000 · InternationalHOPE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES: $40,000 · International+1 more: $220 · InternationalHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFORTE FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMichael S Heiser Foundation: $10,000 · ReligionUPPER COLORADO RIVER ALLIANCE: $5,000 · EnvironmentFND Courage: $1,260 · Health
Other$1,218,150Education$708,550Human Services$270,000International$115,220Philanthropy$30,000Religion$10,000Environment$5,000Health$1,260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $523,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJEREMIAH'S HOPE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $150,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILD PHILANTHROPY INC: $75,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetScholar Leaders International: $45,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES: $40,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichael S Heiser Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetColorado Christian University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORTE FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUPPER COLORADO RIVER ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFND Courage: $1,260 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH'S HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILD PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Scholar Leaders International ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Michael S Heiser Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University ↗
  • Who funds FORTE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds UPPER COLORADO RIVER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FND Courage ↗
  • Who funds POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Esther Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Esther Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Esther’s filings →

    More from the funding graph