Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Esther and William Benenson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$294kPhilanthropy$97kCivil Rights$80kHuman Services$60kInternational$40kArts & Culture$31kHealth$16kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY$50,000
U J A FEDERATION$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$4,000
NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICAN FOUNDATION$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
CAMP RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN$3,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$3,000
COOKE CTR FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT$3,000
THE WASSAIC PROJECT$3,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION (ACLU) FOUNDATION$2,500
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$2,500
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION$2,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COOKE CTR & LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 17%COOKE CTR & LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $6k → 17%COOKE CTR FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%COOKE CTR FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%COOKE CTR FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%COOKE CTR FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $4k → 17%COOKE CTR FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 17%COOKE CTR FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 19 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$611k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-33%

Still filing today

68%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsInternationalPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +39%
  • CS
    COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +53%
  • TW
    THE WASSAIC PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +181%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHABAD OF NORTHEAST QUEENS
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • JC
    JEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -33%
  • TH
    TZIVOS HASHEM
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
6
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
7
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
8
University of Judaism Foundation
—
9
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
10
American Council for World Jewry Inc

Founded so jews, worldwide, can join together in partnership, ensuring our common good and coolective survival. the council acts in the belief that the key to successfully countering threats against the jewish people and the state if…

Civil Rights
11
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
12
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee; the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $260,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INCThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $18,500 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee I…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $97,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-…FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFEDERATION OF JEWISH …REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $22,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDO…WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $18,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDIC…Individual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $10,500 · OtherWORLD JEWISH CONGRE…CAMP RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $9,500 · OtherCAMP RAMAPO FOR CHI…Individual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $11,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD …YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherYESHIVA UNIVERSITY+6 more: $12,440 · Other+6 moreCOOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $40,500 · Human ServicesTHE WASSAIC PROJECT INC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureJEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $1,800 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $13,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $9,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $23,000 · Crime & Legal
International$278,500Philanthropy$117,000Other$108,940Human Services$40,500Arts & Culture$29,300Civil Rights$24,500Crime & Legal$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $260,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $97,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $40,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASSAIC PROJECT INC: $27,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget1 MILLION 4 ANNA FOUNDATION: $540 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE WASSAIC PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds 1 MILLION 4 ANNA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Esther and William Benenson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Esther and William Benenson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Esther and William Benenson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph