Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

The Erma a Bantz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
20%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 9
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$214k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations The Erma a Bantz Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$53k0%
FY20245$60k20%
FY20236$82k17%
FY20229$117k78%
FY20218$78k63%
FY20206$90kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$303kEducation$90kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$20kRecreation & Sports$14kAnimals$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($208k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Erma a Bantz Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClovernook Center For the Blind and Visually Impaired: $65,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOhio Valley Voices: $60,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCincinnati Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget4 Paws for Ability Inc: $27,650 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSt Rita School For The Deaf: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLiving Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Healthcare Connection Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLuke5adventures: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetVisually Imparied Preschool Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Joseph Home Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Cincinnati Tennis Foundation: $4,320 over 1y, 1.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Spaulding Foundation · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Hcs Foundation · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Erma a Bantz Foundation with peer funders

About The Erma a Bantz Foundation

How much does The Erma a Bantz Foundation give?
The Erma a Bantz Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $52,650 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 9 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does The Erma a Bantz Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (63%), Education (19%), Human Services (6%).
Who are The Erma a Bantz Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Clovernook Center For the Blind and Visually Impaired ($65k), Ohio Valley Voices ($60k), Cincinnati Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired ($40k).
Does The Erma a Bantz Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Erma a Bantz Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Erma a Bantz Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Greater Cincinnati Foundation, Spaulding Foundation, Pfau Charitable Foundation.
Where is The Erma a Bantz Foundation based?
The Erma a Bantz Foundation is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Erma a Bantz’s filings →

More from the funding graph