Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ergon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$4.3MCommunity Improvement$595kInternational$175kRecreation & Sports$40k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $970k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250,000
PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK$150,000
REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC$140,000
PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK$125,000
GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY$120,000
REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC$100,000
PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK$75,000
POIEMA PUBLICACIONES USA$60,000
REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC$50,000
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH$50,000
PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK$50,000
CROSS VISION MISSIONS$50,000
GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY$25,000
INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS$25,000
REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC$17,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%POIEMA PUBLICACIONES USA: $60k → 11%MANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $250k → 14%GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY: $120k → 12%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $150k → 8%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $160k → 7%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $270k → 9%FREEDOM CHURCH BALTIMORE INC: $100k → 19%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $140k → 15%MANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $100k → 14%GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY: $110k → 12%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $132k → 8%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 7%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $270k → 9%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $100k → 15%MANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $40k → 14%GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY: $102k → 12%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $125k → 8%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 7%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $230k → 9%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $100k → 15%MANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $40k → 14%GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY: $102k → 12%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $100k → 8%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 7%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $180k → 9%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $100k → 15%GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY: $102k → 12%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $75k → 8%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $35k → 7%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $120k → 9%REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 15%MANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $140k → 14%GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY: $100k → 12%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $65k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $92k → 9%CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH: $50k → 14%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $65k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $90k → 9%CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH: $50k → 14%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $50k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $80k → 9%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $50k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $60k → 9%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $50k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIS: $36k → 9%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $50k → 8%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $50k → 8%PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
IN
MO
KY
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 15 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$6.0M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+4%

Still filing today

53%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +31%
  • RA
    REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INCORPORATED
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +171%
  • CV
    CROSS VISION MISSIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $632k · revenue +6% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • FC
    FREEDOM CHURCH BALTIMORE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IB
    INTERSTATE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • PB
    PARK BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
2
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
3
Amea Ministries International

Amea ministries international advances the proclamation of the christian gospel and the church throughout africa, the middle east, and asia.

Religion
4
Equip Ministries International

Equip Ministries trains overseas pastors and leaders, empowers the church, provides humanitarian aid, and attempts to reach the unreached peoples around the world by working with church leaders to fulfil

Religion
5
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
6
Reach Ministries International

Rmi's activities include evangelism, discipleship, leadership training & other activities to spread the christian gospel in asia.

Religion
7
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
8
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
9
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
10
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
11
Petra International Ministries Inc

Petra International Ministries exists in order to establish Christ-Centered churches in Latin America, and in the United States, by discipling, teaching, and training nationals and internationals how to believe, obey, abide, serve, and…

Religion
12
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reaching and Teaching International Ministries Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Be Love Orphan Outreach MissionsInc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $1,042,000 · ReligionPILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORKREACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $1,023,250 · ReligionREACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES IN…CROSS VISION MISSIONS INC: $632,000 · ReligionCROSS VISION MISSIONS INC+3 more: $101,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION: $1,651,770 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BA…GRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTY: $661,000 · OtherGRACE COVENANT CHURCH OF BAY COUNTYCAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherFREEDOM CHURCH BALTIMORE INC: $100,000 · Other+6 more: $145,500 · Other+6 moreMANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $595,000 · InternationalMANAS DEVELO…Be Love Orphan Outreach MissionsInc: $60,000 · InternationalBe Love Orph…LAST BELL MINISTRIES INC: $48,000 · InternationalLAST BELL MI…WALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $40,000 · Youth Development
Religion$2,798,250Other$2,658,270International$703,000Philanthropy$250,000Youth Development$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK: $1,042,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetREACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $1,023,250 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCROSS VISION MISSIONS INC: $632,000 over 9y, 31% of budgetMANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $595,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetWALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBe Love Orphan Outreach MissionsInc: $60,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetLAST BELL MINISTRIES INC: $48,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFootprints Abroad International Ministries Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetLINC Up Missions Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PILLAR CHURCH PLANTING NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds REACHING AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CROSS VISION MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MANAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds WALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POIEMA PUBLICACIONES USA ↗
  • Who funds Be Love Orphan Outreach MissionsInc ↗
  • Who funds LAST BELL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Footprints Abroad International Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINC Up Missions Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ergon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ergon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ergon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ergon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ergon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph