Skip to content

· Private foundation

The EPIK Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$696kHealth$265kCommunity Improvement$250kEducation$200kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$55,000
BRAVO COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL FOUNDATION$30,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$25,000
VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
VAIL INTERNATIONAL DANCE FESTIVAL$20,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$15,000
SANTA FE OPERA$15,000
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE COUNTY$10,000
MUSEUM OF INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART$5,000
ASPEN SANTA FE BALLET$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%VAIL VETERANS PROGRAM: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 13 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$1.0M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+17%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +139%
  • LP
    LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    4× · 2019–2025 · $103k · revenue +132%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    5× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • BC
    BRAVO COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • BV
    BRAVO VAIL
    one grant, 2019 · $51k
  • VV
    VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION-STAR GALA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
2
Bravo Colorado At Beaver Creek-Vail Inc Dba Bravo Vail Valley Music Festival

Enriching people's lives through the power of music.*producing the finest performances by the greatest artists*fostering music education, and*promoting a life-long appreciation for the arts

Arts & Culture
3
Eagle River Valley Childcare

Eagle river valley childcare is strategically designed to address the childcare supply and affordability issues in the eagle county, colorado community.

Human Services
4
Vail-Summit Research & Education Foundat
Education
5
Vanguard Concerts
—
6
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
7
Vvmc Diversified Services

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
8
Colorado Ballet

Colorado ballet's mission is to present exceptional classical ballet and contemporary dance through performances, training, education and community engagement while inspiring and growing an increasingly diverse audience base.

Arts & Culture
9
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
10
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
11
The Van Wert Area Performing Arts Foundation

Advance the purposes of the van wert county foundation by stimulating the community interest in the performing arts by sponsoring public performances of concerts, dance, theater, and public school performing arts programs and other similar…

Arts & Culture
12
Wind River Valley Artist Guild
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Valley Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Food Depot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRAVO COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $192,500 · OtherBRAVO COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL FOUNDATIONCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FUND: $150,000 · OtherCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FUNDBRAVO COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL: $110,000 · OtherBRAVO COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVALVAIL INTERNATIONAL DANCE FESTIVAL: $65,000 · OtherVAIL INTERNATIONAL DANCE FESTIVALBRAVO VAIL: $51,000 · OtherBRAVO VAILIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+7 more: $60,000 · Other+7 moreVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Community ImprovementVAIL VALLEY FOUNDA…VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $195,000 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERV…Starting Hearts: $30,000 · HealthStarting HeartsTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $90,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE…VAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY: $45,000 · Arts & CultureVAIL PERFORM…VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureVILAR PERFOR…ASPEN SANTA FE BALLET: $10,000 · Arts & CultureASPEN SANTA …+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $102,500 · PhilanthropyYOUTHPOWER365: $5,000 · PhilanthropyEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY: $50,000 · EducationTHE FOOD DEPOT: $10,000 · Human ServicesVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$708,500Community Improvement$250,000Health$225,000Arts & Culture$170,000Philanthropy$107,500Education$50,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $102,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY: $50,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetVAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY: $45,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetStarting Hearts: $30,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN SANTA FE BALLET: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTHPOWER365: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY ↗
  • Who funds VAIL PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Starting Hearts ↗
  • Who funds VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN SANTA FE BALLET ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHPOWER365 ↗
  • Who funds THE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winmax Foundation IncOH15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winmax Foundation Inc · Frechette Family Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The EPIK Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The EPIK Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The EPIK Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The EPIK Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on EPIK’s filings →

    More from the funding graph