How much does The Enrichment Foundation give?

The Enrichment Foundation reported 41 grants totaling $2,255,700 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 33 and 40 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.

What does The Enrichment Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (67%), Human Services (19%), Housing & Shelter (4%).

Who are The Enrichment Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: The Visiting Nurse Health Services ($1.2M), Nebraska Game and Parks Commission ($1.1M), Connected Roots Care Center ($1.0M).

Does The Enrichment Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 13% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Enrichment Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Sherwood Foundation, The Lozier Foundation, Immanuel Community Vision Foundation.

Where is The Enrichment Foundation based?

The Enrichment Foundation is based in NE.

The Enrichment Foundation

The Enrichment Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

The Enrichment Foundation

To help support the Omaha Community Foundation's mission by helping to enrich the physical, emotional, and mental needs of individuals who are physically unable to care for themselves in and around the Omaha metropolitan area.

$2.3M

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$250k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$7.1MHuman Services$2.0MHousing & Shelter$440kCommunity Improvement$345kRecreation & Sports$245kEmployment$180kCrime & Legal$145kAnimals$53kOther$0

02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $10k
$10k–50k26 grants · $654k
$50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
$250k+1 grant · $250k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$50M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Visiting Nurse Health Service	$250,000
Childrens Respite Care Ctr	$200,000
Nebraska Assistive Technology	$200,000
Munroe Meyer Institute	$150,000
Quality Living Inc	$100,000
Easter Seals Society of Neb	$100,000
Ollie Webb Center Inc	$90,000
Project Houseworks	$80,000
Gotta Be Me Inc	$75,000
United Cerebral Palsy of Neb	$75,000
Alzheimers Association Neb	$75,000
HELP Adult Services	$65,000
Executive Services Corp of NE	$65,000
Paralyzed Veterans of America	$50,000
WHY ARTS Inc	$40,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$10M · 42 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10M

$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%

+31%

Still filing today

93%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CR
CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +130%
ES
EASTER SEALS NEBRASKA
5× · 2020–2024 · $470k · revenue +58%
QL
QUALITY LIVING INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $435k · revenue +42%

Funded once

MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
one grant, 2020 · $95k · revenue +1%
LO
LEAGUE OF HUMAN DIGNITY INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +92%
CD
CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +31%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

Complex Disorders Alliance Inc

To accelerate scientific discoveries that will lead to breakthrough diagnostics, therapeutics and cures for people living with neuroimmune axis disorders.

Philanthropy

Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services

American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement

Connectability of Mn Inc

Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.

—

Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—

Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services

Able Inc

A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…

Human Services

Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion

Als One Inc

The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…

Health

Mid-Nebraska Individual Services Inc

To provide a reasonable volume of developmentally disabled services to residents of the surrounding region who are or shall be diagnosed or thought to be developmentally disabled.

Human Services

Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Nebraska; the most unlike its peers is Whyarts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

47/47

Grantees still filing

34/47

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Health$3,696,550Other$3,396,600Human Services$2,675,050Community Improvement$345,000Philanthropy$167,500Arts & Culture$160,000Recreation & Sports$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE44.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Dorothy B Davis Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Enrichment Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Enrichment Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Enrichment Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Enrichment Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Enrichment’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home