Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Elsevier Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$946k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$7.2MEmployment$968kHealth$435kEnvironment$160kEducation$158kYouth Development$150kInternational$88kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $219k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $693k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$397k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNESCO$210,000
CONCERN WORLDWIDE$100,000
STICHTING AIDSFONDS SOA AIDS NEDERLAND$90,000
FALLING WALLS FOUNDATION$90,000
WILDTYPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD$75,000
FRIENDS OF RESEARCH 4 LIFE$70,000
CAREERS RESEARCH AND ADVISORY CENTRE (CRAC)$57,600
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SINGAPORE$32,000
UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA$27,972
IMC WEEKENDSCHOOL$25,000
ITOCA$16,790
CHINESE WOMEN SCIENTISTS (CWAST)$15,000
JUSTINE AKORFA EFAU DAGADU$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 15% of grant dollars ($1.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 85% that went abroad ($7.8M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 30% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDS OF RESEARCH 4 LIFE: $70k → 11%WILDTYPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD: $75k → 10%KEVIN CHRISTOPHER BROWN JR: $11k → 11%KITTEN RESCUE: $10k → 14%SANSUM DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%STEVE OSHIOKHAI ESHIEMOGIE: $500 → 11%HOPE FOUNDATION (CYCLONE MICHAUNG): $3k → 13%INTI MUDA INDONESIA: $3k → 15%SENEGAL ALFRED MABRY: $11k → 16%JUSTINE AKORFA EFAU DAGADU: $11k → 17%UNESCO: $245k → 8%TATJANA WASHINGTON: $500 → 20%NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR NURSING: $100k → 14%AZANA COCHRAN: $500 → 5%TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 32%JK GROUP INC: $151k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%NC Universitys Julius L Chambers Biomedical and: $100k → 11%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 15%THE FOUNDATION FOR NC A&T STATE: $10k → 16%ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%ZACH M WALLACE: $500 → 23%HAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%SRI KARUNAMAYI CENTER: $5k → 11%FRIENDS FOR RESEARCH4LIFE: $70k → 11%WILDTYPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD: $75k → 10%CONCERN WORLDWIDE: $50k → 17%UNESCO: $210k → 8%NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR NURSING: $5k → 14%TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 32%BBRI: $100k → 11%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 15%THE FOUNDATION FOR NC A&T STATE: $10k → 16%HAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%WILDTYPE TECHNOLOGIES: $50k → 10%GIRLS INC OF NEW YORK CITY: $75k → 17%UNESCO: $100k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%GIRLS INC OF NEW YORK CITY: $75k → 17%NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MI
NY
NV
IN
PA
RI
CA
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 85% of all-years giving ($7.8M)

26 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Netherlands$5.2M · 23 grants
Kenya$842k · 3 grants
France$555k · 3 grants
Germany$241k · 12 grants
Nepal$154k · 2 grants
Belgium$150k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$148k · 9 grants
Italy$103k · 2 grants
Poland$100k · 1 grant
Ireland$100k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.8M · 26 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
42

Total granted

$7.8M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+1%

Still filing today

23%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $316k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +25%
  • NL
    National League for Nursing
    2× · 2022–2023 · $105k · revenue +5%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • JG
    JK GROUP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $151k
  • T
    TWAS
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SD
    Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
4
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
5
Fudan University Education Development Foundation

1) Support academic research and talents cultivation in Fudan University. 2) Promote higher education in Fudan University and other educational organizations in China. 3) Strengthen global cooperations of education and research. 4) Enhance…

Education
6
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Corporation for National Research Initiatives

Scientific research in information processing; fostering dev. of nat'l inf. infra.

Science & Tech
10
Syracuse University

Organization's missionas a university with the capacity to attract and engage the best scholars from around the world, yet small enough to support a personalized and academically rigorous student experience, syracuse university faculty and…

Education
11
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National League for Nursing; the most unlike its peers is Kitten Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,343,485 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEMPLOYEE MATCHING GIFTS: $855,657 · OtherEMPLOYEE MATCHING GIFTSUNESCO: $555,000 · OtherUNESCOIndividual grant recipient: $546,458 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+78 more: $2,338,596 · Other+78 moreFRIENDS OF RESEARCH4LIFE INC: $140,000 · InternationalCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $50,000 · InternationalGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY: $150,000 · Civil RightsSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthNORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationWinston-Salem State University Foundation Inc: $20,000 · EducationAbraham Baldwin Agricultural College Foundation Inc: $20,000 · EducationTuskegee University: $20,000 · EducationDATAKIND INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyKITTEN RESCUE: $10,000 · Animals
Other$8,639,196International$190,000Civil Rights$150,000Health$105,000Education$80,000Philanthropy$50,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY: $150,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF RESEARCH4LIFE INC: $140,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetNational League for Nursing: $105,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDATAKIND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWinston-Salem State University Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAbraham Baldwin Agricultural College Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTuskegee University: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKITTEN RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RESEARCH4LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds National League for Nursing ↗
  • Who funds Sansum Diabetes Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds DATAKIND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Winston-Salem State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tuskegee University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Elsevier Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Elsevier Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Elsevier Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Elsevier Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elsevier’s filings →

    More from the funding graph