Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$4.4MPhilanthropy$2.0MReligion$728kEducation$424kHealth$265kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kScience & Tech$100kHuman Services$67kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $100
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$19,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION INC$19,000
CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF ARTISTS LEGACIES$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEARTS FOR MOMS: $3k → 11%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of The Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 9 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
56

Total granted

$4.6M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+41%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $4.2M · revenue +37%
  • PB
    Palm Beach Civic Association Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +115%
  • LS
    Leopold Schepp Foundation
    2× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $127k
  • S
    SOAR
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -58%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
The Goldman Sachs Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Paley Center for Media

Description of organization mission: the paley center for media is the premier institution dedicated to advancing the understanding of media-it's artistic value, social impact and historical importance-for the public and media…

Arts & Culture
4
Paulson Family Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Berggruen Institute
Education
6
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Zigler Museum Foundation
—
9
International Academy of Fine Art

The florence acadamy of art was founed in 1991 by daniel graves (see schedule o for details).

International
10
The Pas Foundation
—
11
American Academy of Sciences and Letters Inc

The American Academy of Sciences and Letters (AASL) promotes scholarship and honors outstanding achievement in the arts, sciences, and learned professions. It encourages the fruitful exchange of ideas within academia and society at large…

Education
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Soar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $4,200,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC+7 more: $222,600 · Arts & CultureDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,944,128 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GI…GLADES ACADEMY INC: $75,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $19,500 · PhilanthropyTHE PEDDIE SCHOOL: $150,000 · OtherTHE PEDDIE SCHOOLTHE HSS FOUNDATION: $130,000 · OtherTHE HSS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $126,890 · OtherIndividual grant rec…Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…Individual grant recipient: $62,000 · Other+43 more: $949,272 · Other+43 moreSOAR: $100,000 · HealthHANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Health+1 more: $2,800 · HealthTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationThe Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc: $100,000 · Crime & LegalPalm Beach Civic Association Inc: $15,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$4,422,600Philanthropy$2,038,628Other$1,518,162Health$202,800Education$150,000Crime & Legal$100,000Community Improvement$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $4,200,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,944,128 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLADES ACADEMY INC: $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $75,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPalm Beach Civic Association Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLeopold Schepp Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF VERSAILLES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC: $2,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHEARTS FOR MOMS INC: $2,659 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF ARTISTS LEGACIES: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOAR ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLADES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties IncFL13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Center for Creative Education: 2% of income from government
  • Hearts for Moms Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004?

Find your warmest path to The Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ellen and Ian Graham Charitable Foundation U/A 12-18-2004’s filings →

More from the funding graph