Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eierman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$45kReligion$28kArts & Culture$17kPhilanthropy$17kHuman Services$15kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$7kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$246k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CAT ASSISTANCE INC$4,000
ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA$2,000
LOW COUNTRY COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,000
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC$2,000
MAYO CLINIC$2,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION$2,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOWCOUNTRY$2,000
SPCA OF WESTCHESTER$1,500
AIM AT MELANOMA$1,500
UKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%CANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $500 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%CANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $300 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
CA
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 14 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$157k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+51%

Still filing today

64%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureInternationalReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $15k · revenue +23%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $11k · revenue +53%
  • AW
    ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +51%
  • SF
    SKYRA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • HF
    HUGS FOR HARRISON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
2
Animal Adoption & Rescue Foundation of Winston-Salem Inc

Aarf is a nonprofit organization serving the winston-salem area dedicated to finding loving homes for dogs and cats through rescue, foster care, veterinary services, adoption, and education.

Animals
3
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
4
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
5
Animal Coalition of Tampa Inc
Animals
6
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
7
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
8
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
9
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
10
Animal Haven Inc

Animal haven is a nonprofit organization that finds homes for dogs and cats throughout the tristate area. it operates out of its adoption center in lower manhattan which has facilities for dog training and grooming as part of the adoption…

Animals
11
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
12
Worcester Animal Rescue League Inc

Provide and promote humane animal welfare to pets in need.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Westchester Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $41,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOW COUNTRY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $14,000 · OtherLOW COUNTRY COMMUNITY CHURCHSIMPSONWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10,400 · OtherSIMPSONWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHACHILLES TRACK CLUB INC: $6,850 · OtherACHILLES TRACK CLUB INCCENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3,000 · Other+3 more: $6,000 · Other+3 moreCAT ASSISTANCE INC: $25,000 · AnimalsCAT ASSISTANCE INCANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC: $10,300 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF W…SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $8,000 · AnimalsSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INCARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA: $14,750 · Arts & CultureARTS CENTE…ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureROBERT W W…Community Foundation of the Lowcountry: $14,350 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesCANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $800 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,500 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $2,000 · HealthAIM AT MELANOMA: $1,500 · HealthUKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4,300 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,000 · InternationalHUGS FOR HARRISON INC: $2,100 · ReligionRESTORATION ATL MISSION INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$81,750Animals$43,300Arts & Culture$17,250Philanthropy$14,350Human Services$11,300Health$10,000International$5,300Religion$3,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAT ASSISTANCE INC: $25,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA: $14,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Foundation of the Lowcountry: $14,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC: $10,300 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4,300 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUGS FOR HARRISON INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUFFTON SELF HELP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIM AT MELANOMA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPET RESCUE INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORATION ATL MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAT ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of the Lowcountry ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUGS FOR HARRISON INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BLUFFTON SELF HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds AIM AT MELANOMA ↗
  • Who funds PET RESCUE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORATION ATL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE ASSISTANTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eierman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eierman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eierman’s filings →

More from the funding graph