Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eidson Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$107kReligion$90kEducation$44kCrime & Legal$13kPublic Benefit$8kPhilanthropy$6kHealth$5kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$932k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,000
PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN$3,000
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
HELP CENTER FOR LGBT HEALTH WELLNES$3,000
MANNA STOREHOUSE$2,000
WEATHERFORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME$1,000
CARL FARLEY BOYS RANCH$1,000
PCCOA SENIOR CENTER$1,000
FREEDOM HOUSE OF PARKER COUNTY$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
HAPPY HILL FARM$1,000
CENTER OF HOPE$1,000
THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF PARKER COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 9%HAPPY HILL FARM: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 9%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 9%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 9%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $703 → 9%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $7k → 8%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $703 → 10%CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $2k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $2k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $2k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $2k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $2k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $1k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $1k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $1k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $1k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $1k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $1k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $703 → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $703 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 18 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$275k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+25%

Still filing today

39%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MANNA STOREHOUSE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +118%
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +1%
  • PC
    PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • AS
    ALLY S WISH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +25%
  • JC
    JEWEL CHARITY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • WF
    WINE FOR A CAUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
3
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
4
Presbyterian Children's Home of the Highlands Inc

Providing, maintaining and operating a home (including a temporary shelter) for the purpose of protecting, training and educating dependent children.

Human Services
5
Calvary Children's Home

Our purpose is to provide a safe, loving, Christian environment for children needing long-term care who lack a stable home environment due to circumstances beyond their control. We are committed to equipping each child to build meaningful…

Human Services
6
Providence Christian Academy

In dependence upon Almighty God, for His glory alone, and together with family and church, the mission of Providence Christian Academy is to provide exemplary education for the vulnerable in the light of God's Word for time and eternity.

Education
7
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
8
Woodburn Christian Childrens Home Inc

Our mission is to provide a christian home for children in need to minister to children and families on physical, educational, emotional, and spiritual levels.

Human Services
9
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
10
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc

The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.

Human Services
11
Presbyterian Christian School

The mission of presbyterian christian school is to provide a comprehensive college preparatory education distinguished by a biblical worldview to equip students with the moral integrity, intellectual capacity, and social conscience to…

Education
12
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Advocacy Center of Parker County; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $89,800 · OtherGRACE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPABLOVE: $13,000 · OtherPABLOVEPCCOA SENIOR CENTER: $12,403 · OtherPCCOA SENIOR CENTERLGBTQ S A V E S: $11,000 · OtherLGBTQ S A V E SCHILDRENS ADVOCACY: $10,700 · OtherCHILDRENS ADVOCACYRYLE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · OtherKIDS IN A NEW GROOVE: $9,000 · OtherFREEDOM HOUSE OF PARKER COUNTY: $7,700 · Other+9 more: $16,806 · Other+9 moreMANNA STOREHOUSE INC: $18,103 · Human ServicesMANNA STOREHOUSE INCPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $18,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDRENPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $16,403 · Human ServicesPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE I…CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $8,403 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCHHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $8,403 · Human ServicesHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME…PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $5,703 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES …ALLY S WISH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesALLY S WISH INCWEATHERFORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · EducationWEATHERFO…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,403 · EducationHILLSDALE…CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PARKER COUNTY: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$194,409Human Services$80,015Education$24,403Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANNA STOREHOUSE INC: $18,103 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $18,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $16,403 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWEATHERFORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS IN A NEW GROOVE: $9,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $8,403 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,403 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $8,403 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $5,703 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PARKER COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANNA STOREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEATHERFORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN A NEW GROOVE ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALLY S WISH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PARKER COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eidson Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eidson Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eidson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph